SUBSCRIBE:
You are in: Home > 

CRE chief backs recruiter with an unlawful no whites policy

michael millar This article first appeared in Personnel Today magazine. Subscribe online and save 20%.

The man tasked with stamping out racism in the UK is supporting and advising a recruitment firm that is breaking the Race Relations Act by refusing to take on white candidates.

The man tasked with stamping out racism in the UK is supporting and advising a recruitment firm that has broken the Race Relations Act by refusing to take on white candidates.

Trevor Phillips, head of the Commission for Racial Equality (CRE), is on the advisory board of Rare Recruitment, a company that places graduates, but only if they are "visibly from a non-white background".

The board also includes other high profile race relations campaigners such as Sandra Kerr, national director of Race for Opportunity, and Anne Watts, a member of the steering group for the proposed Commission for Equality and Human Rights.

After investigation by Personnel Today, the company pulled its website on Friday and now claims its services are open to everyone, although specialising in ethnic minority candidates.

But Phillips backed Rare Recruitment from the start, despite the Race Relations Act (1976) clearly stating that it is illegal to discriminate against someone due to the colour of their skin. This includes attempts to make up a shortfall in a particular ethnic group in the workplace through positive discrimination.

Section 14 of the Act says it is unlawful for an employment agency to discriminate against a person "by refusing or deliberately omitting to provide any of its services".

Warren Wayne, employment partner at law firm Bird and Bird, said having a "cut off" for the type of people a company takes on is positive discrimination. "It faces problems from candidates who see the service and say they want to participate but are blocked for being from the wrong background," he said.

Raphael Mokades, managing director of Rare Recruitment, insisted that the company was only practising positive action, which is legal under the Act.

But Naomi Feinstein, partner at Lovells law firm, said that positive action only applied to the training of staff and refusing white applicants was "definitely positive discrimination". "Positive action is quite tightly defined - it relates to the provision of training where there is no one of [a certain] racial group employed doing certain work and there only will be if employers offer that training," she said.

A CRE spokeswoman said: "The commission is always mindful of the need for projects such as this to be in accordance with the law, and that is exactly why an advisory board with a range of expertise is necessary in order to ensure such work is taken forward appropriately."

Are employers at risk from using the service?

Carl Gilleard, head of the Association of Graduate Recruiters, said that employers engaging Rare Recruitment do not face a threat of claims of discrimination. Rare does not take on employers as clients on a sole agency basis, making sure they do not go beyond their limited sphere of graduates. It also only takes on employers as clients if they can prove they have an under-representation of ethnic staff.


COMMENTS

 
Positive Action
Just a thought regarding Naomi Feinstein's comment. Positive Action does NOT only apply to training. It applies to a whole host of other HR factors, such as:
- where job opportunities are advertised
- visiting schools and minority support groups to 'reach out' to communities who are under-represented in particular organisations
- adjusting criteria for recruitment, retention and promotion (eg educational qualifications) - particularly where it can be demonstrated that under-represented groups do not have equality of opportunity in education
- other developmental opportunities such as shadowing, mentoring, secondments and so on.

It is about time that people understood what was meant by 'positive action' - it's been with us since 1975!!

Louise Chambers
Equality and Diversity Manager
HM Courts Service, London

Louise Chambers
13 Jan 2006
Positive Discrimination
Shallow, pedestrian and, simply, missing the point.

How many more times will those of us dedicated to equity and diversity be forced to endure such misinformed articles? Millar's ill researched piece fails to identify any of the lawful interventions available to employers through legislation e.g. development activity, mentoring and agreed staffing targets.

Millar appears obsessed with practices which may be deemed as 'Positive Discrimination' which, incidentally, is illegal and neglects to mention Positive Action which is lawful and extensively provided for via the Race Relations Amendment Act. [RRAA]. As a result, we end up with a biased perspective likely to do more to provoke a ready made backlash and fuel negative responses to progressive attempts to address clear under-representation in the workplace which continue to persist.

Finally, as if all of that were not damaging enough, we end up with a loaded 'Barometer Question' the redundancy of which is surpassed only by its illegal basis. Replace it with a question about Positive Action and we may have a worthwhile survey.

Please, no more cheap journalism.

byRAN
11 Jan 2006
CRE no whites policy
What an absolute joke. Imagine the uproar if you tried the same thing but with a No Black or No Asian policy. It is things like this that have led to the emergence once again of the BNP

Matt Browne
11 Jan 2006
CRE Chief backs recruiter with an unlawful no whites policy
Employers should not be able to practise positive discrimination.

Tina Eagles
11 Jan 2006
CommentComment on this Article in HR Space (Sign-in required)

EMAIL ALERTS

Alert me when new articles are added on:
 Race discrimination
 Diversity / Equal opportunities

RELATED RESOURCES

XpertHR, part of the XpertHR Group, brings together the expertise of IRS, LexisNexis Butterworths, CELRE, Personnel Today and a dedicated team of experts to meet the information needs of the busy HR professional.

 
© Reed Business Information 2009