Ex-offender charity Nacro has called for the introduction of a new licensing authority to stamp out discrimination resulting from criminal record checks.
A report released today calls on the government to take urgent ssteps to reform the way people with criminal records are treated in the labour market, by introducing an independent licensing authority which would hold ultimate responsibility for clearing people for employment.
The report – Getting Disclosures Right: A review of the use and misuse of criminal record disclosures – highlights how, under the current system, people who are not a risk to children or vulnerable adults are being refused employment, suspended and dismissed on the basis of wholly irrelevant cautions or convictions.
It uncovers widespread discrimination against people who have a criminal record – even where the nature of their offence means that they would pose no risk – across the public, voluntary and private sector.
Paul Cavadino, chief executive of Nacro, said: "It is vital to have an effective system to protect children and vulnerable adults from those who are a risk to them. However, far too many people with past cautions or convictions for minor non-sexual offences are being unfairly refused jobs.
"A job applicant who was convicted of shoplifting as a teenager but has since matured could prove an excellent care worker. It is absurd to bar them from such work, treating them on a par with a sex offender."
Last year nearly 15,000 of the 20,000 calls to Nacro's helpline were enquiries about criminal record disclosures.
"Too many employers are making discriminatory, unreasonable and in some cases illegal decisions based on completely irrelevant convictions", he said.
Key recommendations of the report include:
my husband has just received his crb check
he is a pcv driver ferrying school children
he has no sexual convictions but 5 years ago had a
small amount of speed on him and because of this
the local authority have suspended him pending
more info on this offence
is this legal
he has not offended since thattime
and no longer
dabbles in any kind od drug
surely this is an infringment of
his civil rights
I personnaly think that it was about time somone did something about the way people think of someone who has simple light convictions because they have simply been convicted. I pesonnaly believe more than anything that this could be helped and dealt by better educating employers through sending information and advisory leaflets. being sure to outline the difference where someone may pose a high threat to staff or public and having no threat.
Being an asian and also being convicted of harrassment of which I really had not much choice but to plead guilty to because of the sensitivity of the matter. I feel like I have been handed the harsher side of things.
I find it difficult to apply for many jobs because of what may be thought of my past doings, people like my self who have never broken the law and on one occasion when it has happened through no due fault of my own I am not aloud to forgett and move on because of the system.
I think specific cases need specific handling and dealt with accordingly.
| Alert me when new articles are added which relate to these topics | |
Criminal records | |
| Alert me when new articles are added which relate to these specialism areas | |
Recruitment and staffing | |