SUBSCRIBE:
You are in: Home > Latest News



A former employee at Herbert Smith has been awarded nearly £40,000, following a tribunal hearing.

A former employee at Herbert Smith has been awarded nearly £40,000, after a tribunal ruled that the law firm had broken the law by refusing to allow her to work flexibly after she returned from maternity leave and making her redundant.

The tribunal, which found Herbert Smith guilty of direct sex discrimination, sex victimisation, unfair dismissal and contraventions of the Part-Time Workers Regulations, also ordered the firm to offer Michelle Langton a new role within the company

Herbert Smith is to appeal against the decision, which will be heard by the Employment Appeal Tribunal on 4 and 5 August.

Langton, who had worked for Herbert Smith for six years, returned from maternity leave in April 2002, on a part-time basis, which included half a day working from home.

In September 2003, she came under increasing pressure from her new line manager, George Kalorkoti, to revert to working during the firm's "core hours", the tribunal heard.

She was told there was "no flexibility" for her to continue to do some of her work from home and that her childcare responsibilities were "not the concern of Herbert Smith".

Kalorkoti said that Langton's future career at the firm depended on whether she was "planning on having any more children".

Langton raised a grievance about Kalorkoti's treatment of her and lodged proceedings under the Sex Discrimination Act 1975.

The tribunal also found one of the firm's senior partners, Paula Hodges, to have victimised her during the grievance procedure in order to protect the firm's interests.

Having lodged the grievance and proceedings, in January 2004, Langton was made redundant while pregnant.

Jenny Watson, acting chair of the Equal Opportunities Commission, said: "In the 21st century, it is astonishing that a senior manager in a law firm could think that a women's career potential ends when she starts a family.

"There is no reason why part-time and flexible working should not be available to people working in senior professional roles and the tribunal's decision makes this very clear. By being so inflexible in its treatment of her, Herbert Smith lost a valuable employee."


COMMENTS

 
Tribunal Case - Flexible working at Herbert Smith
As flexible working specialists, we have been working with the Law Society and the legal profession to see how flexibility can be addressed for women solicitors.
Among the City law firms, there is no homogenous culture. Most firms would say they provide workplace and working time flexibility, though often this is more available to admin and support staff than to professional lawyers. Some provide career breaks and sabbaticals, though typically these are short breaks (two or three months) and for senior lawyers with long years of service. In most firms, flexible work options are not consistent throughout the organisation. They depend on the area of specialism and on the attitude of individual managers. Usually, they are not available without penalty in terms of career progression and remuneration. A typical manifestation across the profession is a high attrition rate of women in the 30 to 40 year age bracket and a disproportionately low number of women at partnership level. In the legal profession, in addition to the deal driven long hours culture, the partnership structure of firms is a significant factor. This often gives rise to an ‘up or out’ approach to career progression. Attrition at middle stages of the career path is an accepted, and viewed by some firms as a necessary, component of the business model.
The impact of this for the profession is a significant loss of talent. More that 50% of trainee intake is women, but less than 20% achieve partnership level. Thirty years ago, less than 2% of all solicitors were women. Today it is more than 40%. The profession has not yet fully adapted to reflect this change.
We are setting up a pilot for the legal profession which offers a new model of flexible working - flexibility over the course of a long-term career. This will allow women solicitors to take career breaks and facilitate a return to professional life through the provision of career management support, interim project or contract work, ongoing training and networking. It will be suppported by the Law Society and major law firms. If it is successful for the legal profession, we hope the model will be adopted by other professions. Please contact me if you would like to know more about this pilot, or flexible working in the legal profession.

Lynette Swift
02 Aug 2005
CommentComment on this Article in HR Space (Sign-in required)

EMAIL ALERTS

Alert me when new articles are added on:
 Sex discrimination
 Recruitment and staffing

RELATED RESOURCES

XpertHR, part of the XpertHR Group, brings together the expertise of IRS, LexisNexis Butterworths, CELRE, Personnel Today and a dedicated team of experts to meet the information needs of the busy HR professional.

 
© Reed Business Information 2009