SUBSCRIBE:
You are in: Home > Latest News

This article first appeared in Personnel Today magazine. Subscribe online and save 20%.

Employers have been warned against complacency over the legal challenge to the mandatory retirement age, after the expected date for a verdict slipped towards 2009.

Solicitors acting for Heyday, the Age Concern group behind the challenge, admitted that ongoing legal arguments have postponed a European Court of Justice (ECJ) decision for at least another 18 months.

But, with a survey revealing that three in four small firms have made no provision for staff wishing to work beyond 65, lawyers said such companies were risking retrospective legal action.

The UK High Court ruled in December 2006 that the Heyday case against the Department of Trade and Industry should be referred to the ECJ. Solicitors for the two parties were expected to agree on a list of questions for referral by January, but are still arguing over the wording.

Andrew Lockley, solicitor at Irwin Mitchell, which is acting for Heyday, said: "Companies making people retire are leaving themselves open to legal risk."

EMAIL ALERTS

Alert me when new articles are added on:
 Retirement
 Diversity / Equal opportunities

RELATED RESOURCES

Personnel Today on Facebook
With the recent ruling in the Heyday case, there is widespread speculation that the Government will scrap the default retirement age. But what will this mean for employers? IRS is conducting research to investigate the use of a default retirement age, and explore employer practice in this area. Taking part will not only guarantee you receive a complimentary copy of the report but will also give you immediate access to a free copy of the XpertHR line manager briefing on retirement report.

 
© Reed Business Information 2010