Leitch Review response calls for skills revolution to keep UK competitive in global economy
The government has called for a 'skills revolution' in its official response to the Leitch Review, setting out what it will do to tackle the looming skills shortage in the UK.
Skills secretary John Denham told MPs that the government would aim to bring about a skills revolution to make UK skills sit within the “top quartile” of leading global economies by 2020.
Leitch warned that unless the UK becomes a world class provider of skills by 2020, it will face a “bleak future” compared to the likes of India and China.
Denham reminded the House that to achieve the “huge” targets set out in the Leitch Review, including getting more than 90% of adults trained to Level 2 (the equivalent of five GCSEs), and over 40% of adults qualified to Level 4 or above by 2020, there needed to be a culture change in both employers and individuals.
Training must be delivered to employers’ needs and be “demand-led”, he said, adding that employers had a shared responsibility to achieve this.
Denham highlighted the Train to Gain initiative, which uses 'skills brokers' to assess individual company needs and develops bespoke training packages.
He also reminded MPs of the skills pledge, launched in June, where many large employers had already committed to training their staff to level 2 by 2010, and of the TV ad campaign to drive up interest in skills.
The Liberal Democrats said much of Denham’s statement was simply a restatement of the Leitch Review targets, and a re-announcement of previous statements from other ministers.
On behalf of Liberal Democrat shadow education secretary Sarah Teather, a party spokesman asked what the government meant by "refocusing the sector skills councils" and calls for more employers to collaborate with universities.
"Most employers already collaborate with universities,” the spokesman said. He asked the government to clarify what it meant by “stepping up the drive” on the skills pledge.
Conservative shadow education secretary David Willetts said the government’s response was a “downgrading of ambition” from previous statements on skills.
COMMENTS
Sir
For 30 years I have seen successive Governments, educational institutions and various management bodies parrot the recommendations of the Leitch report for skills and learning. For the same period our skills and learning have lagged our major competitors, suggesting that we have an inherent propensity not to listen or to learn.
This deficiency can be seen in almost every area of endeavour, where the catalogue of repeated mistakes, re-invented wheels and unlearned lessons have become a deafening chorus, evidenced by the self-admission by our managers that one in four of their decisions is wrong (Capgemini, 2004). The cost of wasted productivity is equally high - 7.6% of GDP (Proudfoot, 2005), which, if cut, could make a significant impact on our poor record of global competitiveness.
Given that this is the whole reason for the recommendations, then part of the Leitch package should include dedicated attention to the management discipline called experiential learning, which is a subject still largely misconceived, conspicuously absent and studiously ignored by industry, commerce and business schools. That’s probably because industry, commerce and business schools have yet to recognise the iceberg-like downside effects of the flexible labour market, which has imposed on the modern-day workplace a jobs discontinuity that has given employers an institution-specific corporate amnesia and an unavoidable inability to benefit from their own expensively-acquired hindsight.
Bottom line, a key management skill should not be overlooked. Also, it is of little use improving the skills of workers if the decision-making skills of managers are equally poor.
Sincerely,
Arnold Kransdorff
Author, “Corporate Amnesia” (Butterworth Heinemann, 1998) & “Corporate DNA” (Gower, 2006).
www.pencorp.co.uk
www.corporate-amnesia.com
email: ak@corporate-amnesia.com
Arnold Kransdorff
RELATED ARTICLES
- Skills minister David Lammy brushes off criticism of Leitch pledge efforts
- Skills minister David Lammy to announce Train to Gain expansion plans
- Skills secretary John Denham calls on employers to persuade each other to sign up to Leitch skills pledge
- Firms offer huge pay hikes to retain skilled workers
- Leitch Review skills pledge only attracts a further 50 companies since June launch
- Different solution for different sectors is only way to tackle skills crisis
- Norwich financial skills academy is first of autumn crop of new national academies
- CBI chief Richard Lambert condemns government's slow response to Leitch review of skills
- Have a rant: Ageism and the pledge
- Obsession with Level 2 by skills brokers stalls Train to Gain scheme claims CBI
- Discussing people issues with Dubya
- Train to Gain system is too complex, says Commons education and skills committee
ALSO SEE...
ALERTS
SUPPLIER NEWS
The latest news from industry suppliers:
More Supplier News