SUBSCRIBE:
You are in: Home > Latest News

Nic Paton Occupational HealthThis article first appeared in Occupational Health magazine. Subscribe online and save 20%.

Black Review recommendation: an integrated approach to occupational health should be underpinned by:

  • the inclusion of occupational health and vocational rehabilitation within mainstream healthcare
  • clear professional leadership
  • clear standards of practice and formal accreditation for all providers
  • a revitalised workforce
  • a sound academic base
  • systematic gathering and analysis of data and
  • a universal awareness and understanding of the latest evidence and most effective interventions.

Occupational health, as a profession, a service and a concept, will need to be fundamentally rethought and overhauled, with key challenges including OH's historical detachment from mainstream healthcare, its focus only on those in work and its uneven provision and inconsistent quality.

On top of this, there is the challenge of a diminishing OH workforce, a shrinking academic base and a lack of good-quality data.

"Its [OH's] practitioners must address a wider remit and embrace closer working with public health, general practice and vocational rehabilitation in meeting the needs of all working age people. This should be underpinned by clear workforce plans, clear standards of practice and formal accreditation of all providers," the report recommended.

This would require clear professional leadership from the OH and vocational rehabilitation communities "to expand their remits and work with new partners in supporting the health of all working age people".

At the same time, there would need to be a change in how services were commissioned.

"Government needs to ensure that commissioners of health services understand the importance of tackling working age ill-health, the needs of working age people and the interventions that are most effective in tackling the health conditions suffered by them," the report said.

An electronically-based fit note, could be closely linked to the new Fit for Work service.

"Drawing on the expertise of the Fit for Work teams proposed the 'fit note' can become a vehicle for providing practical advice to both the patient, and potentially their employer, about how a return to work can be achieved," the report said.

An electronic system would result in improved recording and analysis of certification, it added.

"There is a new and exciting opportunity for the OH specialty in Britain today to seize the initiative and lead a development that unites all those engaged in improving, safeguarding or restoring the health of all working age people.

"This would ensure a dynamic specialty into which it would be much easier to recruit new professionals who would have a rewarding role and a secure and exciting career," the report suggested.

Key conclusions of the Dame Carol Black report

  • The economic costs of sickness absence and worklessness associated with working age ill-health are more than £100bn a year, greater than the current annual budget for the NHS
  • The evidence base to support the business case for investment in the health and wellbeing of their employees is inadequately understood by employers
  • Lack of appropriate information and advice is the most common barrier to employers investing in health and wellbeing, and this is particularly true for smaller organisations
  • GPs often feel ill-equipped or ill-trained to offer advice to their patients on remaining in or returning to work
  • The current sickness certification process focuses on what people cannot do, thereby institutionalising the belief that it is inappropriate to be at work unless 100% fit and that being at work normally impedes recovery
  • There is insufficient access to support for patients in the early stages of sickness, including those with mental health conditions
  • GPs have inadequate options for referral and OH provision is disproportionately concentrated among a few large employers, leaving the vast majority of small firms unsupported
  • The scale of the numbers on incapacity benefits represents an historical failure of healthcare and employment support for the workless in Britain
  • The detachment of occupational health from mainstream healthcare undermines holistic patient care
  • A weak and declining academic base combined with the absence of any formal accreditation procedures, a lack of good quality data and a focus solely on those in work, impedes the profession's capacity to analyse and address the full needs of the working age population.

Key recommendations of the Black report

  • Government should work with employers and representative bodies to develop a robust model for measuring and reporting on the benefits of employer investment in health and wellbeing. Employers should use this to report on health and wellbeing in the boardroom and company accounts
  • Safety and health practitioners and, where present, trades union safety representatives, should play an expanded role in acting to promote the benefits of such investment
  • Government should initiate a business-led health and wellbeing consultancy service, offering tailored advice and support and access to occupational health support at a market rate, geared towards smaller organisations
  • GPs and other healthcare professionals should be supported to adapt the advice they provide, where appropriate doing all they can to help people enter, stay in or return to work
  • The paper-based sicknote should be replaced with an electronic fit note switching the focus to what people can do and improving communication between employers, employees and GPs
  • Government should pilot a Fit for Work service based on case-managed, multidisciplinary support for patients in the early stages of sickness absence, with the aim of making access to work-related health support available to all
  • An integrated approach to working age health should be underpinned by: the inclusion of occupational health and vocational rehabilitation within mainstream healthcare
  • There should be clear professional leadership, standards of practice and formal accreditation for all providers, a revitalised workforce, a sound academic base and systematic gathering and analysis of data.

COMMENTS

 
OH overhaul / Black report

Hello,


I am commenting on the summary recommendations of the Black report as a former TU activist. I often defended memberswith OH problems involving a stressful work situation leading to ill health.


TU safety personnel would love to be recognised in fact, not just by tick box. My experience is that advice given by OH is ignored by employers where convenient. Unions backing OH advice seems only to make them dig their heels in.


The idea of the "fitnote"; is this to be taken as a legally binding statement that the person is fit for tasks to be listed? If so, what if they prove not to be - who is liable? What if the line manager ignores this and barks at the employee to go outside the  limit? Would its introduction end the practice of ringing staff at home and badgering them to return to work? Are Gp's, in effect, to be co-opted by employers and will this end patient confidentiality?


The "business-led health and wellbeing consultancy service": is this to be comletely independent of both employers and staff? How binding would any of its recommndations be? Will the CBI pay for something it presumably now thinks it must have, as it never has paid to improve the public education it criticises? Or will it be like the HSE; undefunded and understaffed and to be moved out of the city?


Has anyone else reading this experienced how sickness absence can be brought,against workers who were injured doing the employers tasks or who have suffered due to bullying by seniors at work? Why should this have even happened with OH in existence in whatever form?


Just a few thoughts from "the other side".


Mike Bovingdon


Mike Bovingdon
07 May 2008
CommentComment on this Article in HR Space (Sign-in required)

EMAIL ALERTS

Alert me when new articles are added on:
 Occupational health
 Health & Safety

RELATED RESOURCES

XpertHR, part of the XpertHR Group, brings together the expertise of IRS, LexisNexis Butterworths, CELRE, Personnel Today and a dedicated team of experts to meet the information needs of the busy HR professional.

 
© Reed Business Information 2009