Atul Shah (pictured below), founder of Diverse Ethics, looks at the importance of diversity in the HR sector.
At a recent seminar, a senior adviser at the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) publicly said that, as an organisation, it is 'colour blind' – intended to mean that it is not racist. But if people themselves are not colour blind, how can an organisation be so?
In this article, I want to address the sensitive, but critical, issue of racial diversity in the HR sector, and explore why it is – in spite of the rhetoric – there is a dearth of ethnic minority members and little action.
Given that globalisation affects every aspect of personal and organisational life today, it is one of the UK's greatest assets to have such a hugely diverse population. Sadly, this diversity is not well integrated in the workplace, and simply absent from some organisations. There is also strong evidence of glass ceilings – where people can look up and see the senior management, but have no chance of getting there because of their colour or ethnicity.
The structures and ways of working in some organisations are designed in such a way that many ethnic people feel excluded from promotion – by and large, the power culture is singular rather than plural. There is a feeling that ethnic people are there to be used, but not to share power with. It is colonialism in the workplace. The HR profession should be very concerned about this and take a lead in changing the face of the workplace. And the best way to start is to improve the ethnic diversity of its own membership, so that cultural intelligence and sensitivity is inside the profession, not outside and remote from it.
| Diversity in HR |
| According to the last Census in 2001, there are a total of 313,650 HR and training professionals in the UK. Of these, 94.1% stated their ethnic origin as white. The CIPD asks members on a voluntary basis, when they first join, to disclose their ethnic origin, but admitted the data it held was "sparse and unrepresentative". In a statement, a spokesman said: "We do not actively seek to directly influence any aspects of the demographics of the profession. Instead, our commitment is to ensure fair access to the profession for anyone, regardless of their individual background. "We have been working with the government's Fair Access to the Professions panel, and are also active members of the Professional Associations Research Network's 'Equally Professional' group, where we exchange ideas and best practice on diversity. Our involvement in both these initiatives gives us confidence that we are demonstrating best practice in ensuring equal access to the HR profession." |
The business case for ethnic diversity in HR is simple:
If we look at membership of professional bodies in this country, ethnic minority members exceed the national population percentage of 8% by two, three, or even four times, as in the case of medicine. I asked the CIPD about ethnic membership data and, surprisingly, it could not provide any – but it is generally thought that the ethnic diversity of its membership is relatively low. Therefore, there is considerable scope for change and positive action; simply saying that the membership is open and accessible to all is not good enough in my opinion. My suggestions are:
Atul Shah is founder of the internet portal and consultancy www.diverseethics.com
What do you think? Is HR ethnically diverse enough and does it really matter? Post a comment below or e-mail personneltoday@rbi.co.uk
| Visit our Training & Coaching Today channel for the latest training, learning and development news, opinion and analysis |