« Strategic HCM: The Performance-Reward angle | Main | One rule for one, one rule for others - when is a bail-out not a bail-out? »

Human Capital Forensics

The last few entries have been highlighting issues with regard to what is considered core operating contributions from HR, culminating in what 'strategic' looks like (and its not what a lot of people assume).

To recap, I have briefly questioned absenteeism, turnover and coaching. In the same vein, I am making a few comments around recruitment. how effective is your resourcing (recruitment) practice......?

No I didn't ask for time to hire.......I asked for effectiveness - the right people in the right place at the right time for the right reaason? How much does it cost the organisation to get it wrong? How involved is HR in the process? How accurate does it get it? Six sigma? yeh right?....

Not reported - I guess not......

All of the above categories plus another dozen or so have the potential for the HR function to assess and save the company much cost as well as the potential to increase overall performance?

Interested? Yes - then read our press release on human capital forensics. You definitely heard it here first.......

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on September 13, 2007 9:10 AM.

The previous post in this blog was Strategic HCM: The Performance-Reward angle.

The next post in this blog is One rule for one, one rule for others - when is a bail-out not a bail-out?.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.