« Job cuts provide foundation for Olympics | Main | Mice work if you can get it »

Lies, damned lies and workplace illness

July 14, 2008

Guru was recovering in bed from a particularly non-lethal bout of man flu this morning when he accidentally sat on the remote control, lost a classic episode of Monty Python on UK Gold, switched over to the news and discovered that, in the last year alone, up to six million Brits have sued their employers for illnesses or injuries picked up at work.

 

Six million? Hang on a minute.

Considering there are only 29.5 million people in work in the UK, this means more than one in five workers have sued their organisations in the last 12 months.

HR departments must be busy. An average organisation with 100 members of staff would currently be fielding 20 lawsuits from sickly workers - let alone all the others for discrimination, unlawful dismissal and so on.

So what is wrong with all these litigious, injured workers? Well, apparently a quarter of those who had been injured or taken ill because of their work in the last year suffered from stress, another quarter from back pain, and the rest from a variety of disorders including the rather scary sounding 'breathing problems'.

In total, according to the poll by YouGov for insurance firm RSA, 11.8m workers suffered illness or injury at work last year, with half of them opting to sue.

Looking around his friends, Guru reckons the only way this statistic can be true is if people count contacting the common cold from their desk buddies as a work-related illness.

Imagine if that one catches on. Every single commuter and office worker will be able to take December off and sue their employer for the mucus fest that has enveloped them. Employment lawyers will be rich, clipboard-wielding pollsters will be producing even more ridiculous reports, and HR directors will be the only ones left in the workplace, dealing with the very real stress of a thousand legal claims.

Or could it all be down to a little bit of exaggeration by the survey firm? Apparently only 1,979 adults were interviewed for the report - presumably they were found on the admissions list of the nearest hospital.

Share |
Posted for your edification by Guru on July 14, 2008 3:24 PM |

Comments (2)

Bina:

I note that stuff coming out of 'offical' organisations is a complete load of BS most of the time. I noted a similar spurious use of statistics regarding teenagers and their careers aspirations just a couple of days before your post:
http://stonecast.blogspot.com/2008/07/teenagers-wronged.html
Who's paying for this twaddle?

Utter rubbish. People do abuse the system and organisations could be much better at helping/managing absence(delete as appropriate) but this sort of "research" really does not help.

If you are looking for a really "interesting" statistic look at how many people are claiming disability allowance - now there is a crime of huge proportions going on under our noses and we seem more interested in silly people and canoes and thick footballers having a couple of beers!

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

About

This page contains a single entry from Guru's blog posted on July 14, 2008 3:24 PM.

The previous offering of wisdom from Guru was Job cuts provide foundation for Olympics.

The next post in this blog is Mice work if you can get it.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

PersonnelToday.com homepage

About Guru

Guru is Personnel Today's notorious HR commentator. He's been working in HR for far too long and observes every passing management fad with a mixture of anger and amusement. His blog is the one thing saving his long-suffering wife, Mrs Guru, from having to endure too much of his ranting about the big HR stories of the day.

Guru's Tweets

Guru's blogroll