« What is 'Christmas' if we can't be rude and obnoxious? | Main | Tasty proposal for redundancy 'cook-off' »

The real cost of redundancy revealed

January 5, 2009

Guru has noted that the one organisation doing particularly well out of the recession is the CIPD.

The institute has been getting some fantastic media coverage over the past few weeks with its chief number cruncher, John Philpott, becoming almost Robert Peston like in his omnipotence.

Need a quote about how tough things are going to get? Want to know how many workers face the chop in 2009? Then speak to Philpott... Guru half expects him to be wearing a large black cloak and carrying a scythe such is the grim nature of his message.

While Guru was tucking into his roast turkey and all the trimmings, and attempting to consume his own bodyweight in chocolate, Philo has obviously been burning the midnight oil in an effort to solve the economic crisis.

And true to his role as HR's most influential beancounter, he has devised a formula which claims to help employers calculate 'the real cost of redundancy'.

(n × r) + (x × h) + (x × t) + ny (h + t) + wz (p - n)

When Guru first saw this it brought back bad memories of O Level maths lessons and the dreaded algebra. Guru now wishes he paid more attention to teacher rather than doodling offensive pictures on his exercise book.

The CIPD puts the average cost of making someone redundant at £16,375 - so if an employee earns at least £1 more than this then Guru feels it's an attractive option for the HR team.

No doubt we will be hearing more from Mr Philpott as the gloom deepens but his appearances on the BBC go through the roof.

Share |
Posted for your edification by Guru on January 5, 2009 11:31 AM |

Comments (1)

Kevin Bush:

If this doesn't put the final nail in the coffin of the CIPD's credibility I don't know what will. How can anyone really believe that quantifications like this are possible, let alone relevant. Even if it did cost this amount, average salaries are £26k per annum so the cost is recouped within 8 months and is a permanent saving thereafter. And, most importantly, a great many decisions to reduce headcount are based on improving cash flow without which a firm is dead in the water. If we were to take Philpott's philosophy literally we would be "mothballing" employees on full pay until the good times rolled around again! So, we face collapsing revenue and a static fixed cost: that's commercially realistic!

Our exalted HR leaders should leave esoteric number crunching to the real bean-counting profession and come up with some practical views on how firms can survive to live another day.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

About

This page contains a single entry from Guru's blog posted on January 5, 2009 11:31 AM.

The previous offering of wisdom from Guru was What is 'Christmas' if we can't be rude and obnoxious?.

The next post in this blog is Tasty proposal for redundancy 'cook-off'.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

PersonnelToday.com homepage

About Guru

Guru is Personnel Today's notorious HR commentator. He's been working in HR for far too long and observes every passing management fad with a mixture of anger and amusement. His blog is the one thing saving his long-suffering wife, Mrs Guru, from having to endure too much of his ranting about the big HR stories of the day.

Guru's Tweets

Guru's blogroll