« Office noise most distracting for introverts (not that you'll hear them complain) | Main | Liam Fox inspires bring-a-friend-to-work culture »

Ken Clarke can take solace from Shechtman's Nobel example

October 7, 2011

KenClarke.jpg
Image: Rex Features

There is a good lesson for employees in the travails of Ken Clarke this week. The lesson is that being right can be worth very little if your employers don’t agree with you.

Following Theresa May’s speech at the Tory party conference, Ken Clarke reacted to the Home Secretary’s tale of a judge refusing to deport an immigrant because he owned a cat by pointing out that a judge had not refused to deport an immigrant because he owned a cat (Ken Clarke accuses Theresa May of ‘laughable and child-like’ claims). Clarke felt that saying that a judge had refused to deport somebody because he owned a cat was “laughable” and “child-like”, in the light of it not having happened.

Despite generally being regarded as right, it looks like Ken might be facing the chop in the next cabinet reshuffle (Kenneth Clarke prepares for ‘enforced retirement’ following cat spat with May). If Ken does get chased out, perhaps he could take solace from the story of Daniel Shechtman, who this week received the Nobel prize for his discovery of quasicrystals (Israeli Scientist Wins Nobel Prize for Chemistry).

Daniel Shechtman discovered the non-repeating solid structures while working at Technion-Israel Institute of Technology in Haifa where his finding was met with what can most kindly be described as cynicism. The head of his research group told him to read a textbook on first hearing of his discovery and later asked him to leave because he was causing the group to be ridiculed. Rather more intimidating was the opposition to the idea from chemistry giant Linus Pauling who went to the grave adamant that there was a simple explanation for Shechtman’s discovery.

But Shechtman has had the last laugh, both by still being alive and by winning the Nobel prize (though he needs to add a Nobel Peace Prize to equal Pauling’s Nobel haul).

So, in summary, publicly disagreeing with your employer when you are right will result in one of two outcomes - you will be sacked or you will win the Nobel Prize for Chemistry. On the extensive evidence Guru has amassed, these two outcomes are equally likely.

Posted for your edification by Guru on October 7, 2011 12:19 PM |

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

About

This page contains a single entry from Guru's blog posted on October 7, 2011 12:19 PM.

The previous offering of wisdom from Guru was Office noise most distracting for introverts (not that you'll hear them complain).

The next post in this blog is Liam Fox inspires bring-a-friend-to-work culture.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

PersonnelToday.com homepage

About Guru

Guru is Personnel Today's notorious HR commentator. He's been working in HR for far too long and observes every passing management fad with a mixture of anger and amusement. His blog is the one thing saving his long-suffering wife, Mrs Guru, from having to endure too much of his ranting about the big HR stories of the day.

Guru's Tweets

Guru's blogroll