« Employment law | The return of Gordon Gekko | Main | Equal pay | More councils will be getting Cross... »

CBI absence report | Focus on 'sickies' is missing the point

The new CBI-Axa absence survey, launched today, suggests the CBI is obsessed with people throwing 'sickies'. Allegedly, one in 10 people absent are swinging the lead. A similar attitude to the British employee was reflected in the Personnel Today story this week revealing that lie detectors could soon be used to flush out employees on bogus sick leave. Surely, all this is missing the point.

I was at a roundtable debate this morning where Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development chief economist  John Philpott  claimed that in recent years there had been 'sea change' with employers rather moving from being 'narrowly focused on absence management' to looking at the 'underlying causes'.  The event organised by EAP provider Employee Advisory Resource aimed to link employee engagement with employee wellbeing.

The CBI should adopt this thinking. I'd be more impressed if they found out how much presenteeism is costing UK employers. Check out the book 'The Living Dead: Switched Off, Zoned Out - The Shocking Truth About Office Life' by David Bolchover.  Maybe it's outside the remit of the CBI absence report but more emphasis on ideas like 'job enrichment' to incentivise people to turn up at work would be more helpful. The CBI proposes a 'carrot and stick approach' to absence. That might work for donkeys. People are a bit more complicated.

Noel O'Reilly |

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.personneltoday.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/27282

Comments (2)

Stephen W:

Absentee rates are the best barometer of employee engagement I know. A well-trained and motivated employee who is interested in their work will always come in, even if feeling a bit under par. If they are bored with their job or feel under excessive pressure then any opportunity for a day or two off will be taken.

Companies should look very closely at management style, culture and capability where sickness absenteeism is a problem; it is too easy to simply blame the employees.

Amanda Smith:

An engaged employee who knows that they have a supportive reactively flexable workplace culture is far less likely to call in sick if they know that they are seen as a whole person with the pressures of life at work and at home. This is not something that needs to be dependant upon company size as EAP support is not an expensive option.

Companies that value committment to employee health and wellbeing and invest in such with proactive employee assistance provision see cost savings overall as well as a reduction in sickness absence rates and increase in employee retention.

Amanda Smith
Clinical Director
Amian EAP

Post a comment

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on May 14, 2008 4:30 PM.

The previous post in this blog was Employment law | The return of Gordon Gekko .

The next post in this blog is Equal pay | More councils will be getting Cross....

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Archives

Editors' blogroll