« Recruitment | Flip a coin for your next job | Main | Unions | New rights for workers mean more HR headaches »

Discrimination | Time for silly first names to be protected?

Now that we've got discrimination laws against just about everything, I think it's time the protection offered by such legislation is extended to other often ignored groups who may suffer at the hands of discriminatory employers or colleagues.

Before you shout "what about the naturally idle," I think the case should be made for those burdened with stupid Christian - oops, sorry,  thought crime - I mean first names. For instance would you give someone called Number 16 Bus Shelter Matthews a job?  

Number 16 Bus Shelter is one of several barmy first names allowed by New Zeland registrars along with Midnight Chardonnay and Violence, though they did stop short of Sex Fruit and Fish and Chips for twins.

This Kiwi name nightmare came to light after the authorities, suffering a rare outbreak of common sense, banned the name Talula Does The Hula From Hawaii. family court judge said the name "makes a fool of the child and sets her up with a social disability and handicap."

Of course we've been here before. Dead old rocker Frank Zappa named his daughter Moon Unit and his son Dweezil, while David and Angie Bowie named their son Zowie. And of course we've had Apple Martin and River and Leaf Phoenix plus the appalling Peaches and Pixie. NB: The real Phoenix family name was Bottom.

This may be OK in celeb circles where the abnormal is the norm, but it won't help when it comes to getting a job in regularville where it's likely that someone with a daft first name may well not make the interview cut on that fact alone.

It would never happen in France or Italy. There, there are rules on what first names may be used. and you're pretty much stuck with saints. And, from a PC HR let's show discrimination le port point of view, surely that's a practice that should be adopted here.

Personally I think we should all be allowed to choose our own names from the age of 16 - from an approved list of course. Satsuma Charlton is appealing don't you think?

John Charlton |

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.personneltoday.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/32035

Comments (1)

Margaret Stanford:

I agree, it is a-peeling!

Post a comment

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on July 28, 2008 9:00 AM.

The previous post in this blog was Recruitment | Flip a coin for your next job.

The next post in this blog is Unions | New rights for workers mean more HR headaches.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Archives

Editors' blogroll