So the smoking ban has nearly arrived, but what does this mean for the thousands of employees who smoke?
Some employers are putting in place smoking cessation clinics to help employees quit, even to the point of being given time off to overcome their habit. This is causing a divide in the office between the smokers and non-smokers, so where do you stand on the debate?
Read on for our expert Steve Miller's opinion...

Time off to help employees quit? I don't think so. At last UK productivity may be given a healthy boost as we cut down the odd breaks taken by millions of crafty employees enjoying an extra skive.
Business must lose billions as a result of time spent puffing away outside the back door. As for giving time off for these addicts let's also remember their colleagues who don't get such special treatment. If they can afford nearly £6 for a packet of cigarettes they can certainly afford to visit a hypnotherapist, buy nicotine patches or visit a private GP and buy the latest drug!
Time off to help quit? Erm...what's next? Time off to exercise more to lose a bit of weight or for speed dating?
For more information:
Smoking ban: an opportunity to prohibit smoking breaks at work?
Firms plan smoking breaks crackdown
Comments (7)
Posted by Kate Collings | June 19, 2007 3:05 PM
As an ex-smoker, I was able to quit, so why can't they!
Posted on June 19, 2007 15:05
Posted by Fag-ash Lil | June 25, 2007 3:25 PM
As a smoker myself, I agree that employers should not have to pay for employees to attend smoking cessation clinics. However, I would also like to add that I don't take cigarette breaks at all when I'm at work. I choose to smoke during my lunch hour. The same cannot be said, however, for the numerous tea/coffee drinkers that I work with, who spend at least 10 minutes each day making a brew. I don't hear anyone moaning about lost productivity through the making rounds of hot drinks day after day
Posted on June 25, 2007 15:25
Posted by Steve Miller | June 25, 2007 6:04 PM
Ah come on fag ash Lil surely you have to admit that generally smokers request additional breaks to puff on the cigarette. What really infuriates me is when i spot pregnant workers smoking. And to see customers pulling on to the car park observing such filth. Not good is it.....
Posted on June 25, 2007 18:04
Posted by Lisa | June 26, 2007 12:39 PM
Yes it's not easy stopping smoking but you really need to think of the benefits to your health and the health of those around you. I quit 3 years ago after smoking for 12 years and now never think about lighting up. I wonder if some people are also concerned that without fag breaks there will be less time for office gossip!
Posted on June 26, 2007 12:39
Posted by The Boss | October 19, 2007 7:49 PM
You cold hearted lot, why shouldn't an employer take interest and possibly add incentives for their employees to better their health? Better health leads to increased productivity and performance, which inturn creates more profit for the company. This sort of employee benefit also creates loyalty of employees, as they realize the company actually cares about its employees health. There are 2 sides to every story, I suggest you look at it from both angles.
Posted on October 19, 2007 19:49
Posted by thomas | September 13, 2008 4:13 PM
Indeed, those poor companies. The opportunity cost alone of having those employees take a whole 5 or god forbid even 10 minutes to smoke. Damn, I hope the stockholders don't jump ship when they find out.
Thanks Mr Miller for showing, once again, that as human beings we are really all about business and economics, and being human is really a pesky side effect that drags us down every once in a while when we really should be maximizing share holder value, increasing the bottom line, creating relationships with potential customers, and in general, give up any kind of choice for your choice for money as ultimate end goal!
is it just me, or have we mixed means and ends at some point...?!
Posted on September 13, 2008 16:13
Posted by jollyroger | April 28, 2009 3:54 PM
How do you do… FAGS
"We want to help you"
What? If vilifying large groups of society for no reason, ostracising them to the cold climate, bombarding them with nightmarish obscene imagery of cancerous lungs and diseases while already threatening them with death, illness and deformed babies and, AND charging those people more and more money for the privilege of doing that sounds, like a heap of help. Sounds like an invasion of our civil liberties to live, without judgment. Considering the smoking masses make up 1.1 billion of us or 17% of the worlds population. I think that makes a pretty strong, probably not healthy, minority.
more at www.lifetyleguides.blogspot.com
Posted on April 28, 2009 15:54