
According to a report by CIMA (Chartered Institute of Management Accountants) and the IBE (Institute of Business Ethics), 84% of finance professionals believe that business has a moral obligation to address global issues. Over half of the respondents stated that 'environmental impact' is more important to their companies now than it was two to three years ago. While this commitment is laudable, there seems to be a lack of practical action on show - just a third of the organisations surveyed even report on ethical performance or corporate social responsibility. Even fewer (30%) of the respondents actively collect ethical management information, despite the fact that nearly half of those who fail to do so think their organisations would benefit from it.
On a more personal level, the results were reinforced by the respondents' views on their own roles, with over half (59%) saying they contribute to their organisations' ethical performance, and 73% believing that ethical performance will become a formal part of their role in the next few years.
And if management accountants have latched on to an idea, it must be big. But is it really up to the business world? Why should they spend their profits on curing society's ills? Shouldn't this be up to the government? Surely companies with money to spare should be reinvesting it in their staff - training them, providing good working environments, paying them more?
Comments (4)
Posted by Andrew | July 2, 2008 2:18 PM
Tara,
You ask the question whether the business world should spend their money curing society's ills.
A common objection to the notion of Corporate Social Responsibility is that social responsibility should be a function for governments, not business.
I cannot agree with this viewpoint. Business controls a large portion of society's productive resources. This control gives business a great deal of power and influence over the well-being of society.
With that power comes responsibility. Business has the been granted the power of use of society's productive resources. It also has the responsibility to use the resources it has been granted in a socially responsible fashion.
You touch on the role of management accountants in business ethics. One way in which the accounting profession as a whole can contribute to socially responsible behavior is to work with the international community to develop standards to measure organizational performance in terms of the economic, social and environmental impact of its operations.
Cheers
Andrew
Posted on July 2, 2008 14:18
Posted by Steve Carter | July 2, 2008 6:19 PM
Sadly the minute the market tightens up CSR becomes expendible and budgets get slashed yet it's the very time that companies should be looking to play a greater part in society for both themselves and their employees who may need to find other reasons to "feel good" about their employer. CSR shouldn't be faddish and a fashion accessory for business it should be a "hard wired value".
Posted on July 2, 2008 18:19
Posted by Isabel Naidoo | July 2, 2008 6:22 PM
At Accenture, corporate citizenship is at the heart of our business operations. We conduct CSR programmes because our employees expect it, our clients demand it, and our communities benefit from it. For us, it is about managing our community and environmental performance alongside our financial performance, using our core skills to make a greater impact.
Good corporate citizenship also makes strong business sense. We believe the future prosperity of our business is inextricably linked to the health and stability of our wider communities, and therefore our business strategies include investment in, and partnership with, those communities. Our strategic corporate community investment programmes aim to promote sustainable livelihoods through skills development and by integrating our community and business agendas we ensure delivery of long term shared value for our employees, clients and communities.
It is through these mutual benefits that Accenture can make a greater impact. Our employees themselves drive the environmental and community programmes by leveraging their core business competencies, but it also allows them to develop new skills, and offers them a new perspective on their day-to-day roles.
Posted on July 2, 2008 18:22
Posted by Alex Brooks-Johnson | July 2, 2008 6:30 PM
At Richard House Children’s Hospice, we are fortunate to work with some very large companies. The reasons for them wanting to support us vary greatly, but generally they feel some sense of responsibility for helping us deliver our work to the communities of London. Occasionally, it can be a collective, corporate concern where the reciprocal act of some local publicity doesn’t harm the relationship, but more often than not it’s a championing individual or group of individuals who act as the corporate conscience, lobbying, influencing and pulling whatever strings they can to help us. Companies exist only to make money but, thankfully, they are still (mostly) made up of real people aware of real community issues.
Posted on July 2, 2008 18:30