
In this day and age, we'd like to think that employers hire on merit alone, and that a good attitude and sound CV are enough. Consider, then, the case of China's new graduates. All too aware of the importance of looks in an already competitive job market, they are resorting to plastic surgery in a bid to make themselves more employable.
Business at the Shanghai Plastic Surgery Hospital is 40% up on last year, and 50% of its patients have admitted that their surgery is work-related. Popular procedures include nose jobs, reshaping cheekbones to make them rounder, and restyling eyelids. The latter surgery alone costs £510 - the equivalent of a year's tuition fees.
And while students are of one the largest groups going under the knife for employment reasons, white-colour workers who have lost their jobs are also bowing to pressure. Even leg-lengthening surgery is on the rise.
While employers in the UK are not allowed to refer to applicants' physical appearances in job adverts, it's hard to ignore the fact that interviewers, however well-intentioned, will lean towards the better looking applicants. In a 2008 survey by employment law service Peninsula, nearly 90% of employers admitted to having at least once chosen the most attractive candidate for a job.
But why? And should we put up with this? Should we regard improving our personal appearance - without resorting to surgery, one would like to think - as part of our application procedure? Or should employers be coached to see past an applicant's outer appearance to the skills and aptitude within?