The threads and posts to the existing forum below will become read only. Please visit HR Space to add new posts, upload and attach documents, create your own blog and upload photos. If you have any questions regarding HR Space, please email hrspace@rbi.co.uk
| Redundancy notice period | Fraggle | 24 Apr 08 |
| Re: Redundancy notice period | Paul Ball | 6 May 08 |
| Redundancy notice period | Fraggle | 24/04/2008 21:35 | |
|
Is there a minimum or maximum time between the first and last redundancy meetings and the date when a single employee who is being made redundant is released from employment? Can an employer be seen as being unreasonable for drawing out the process over an unduly long period (eg 2months between 2nd & 3rd meetings and then another month after the 3rd meeting before the employee is allowed to leave? |
|||
| + Re: Redundancy notice period | Paul Ball | 06/05/2008 15:50 | paulball@ eversheds com |
|
Hi Fraggle, With individual redundancies, in fact any number less than 20, there is no minimum or maximum period over which consultation should take place. On occasion, a single redundancy might be fairly concluded within a week. So far as maximum periods are concerned, if the delay is because the employer is genuinely trying to ensure that redundancies don't take place then it might not make a difference to the fairness of the process. However, if the process is being drawn out in an attempt to destabilise the employees concerned and in the hope that they will find work elsewhere and leave without having to pay redundancy and notice, then such behaviour would of itself be evidence of unfairness in the procedure. It could also arguably be treated as a breach of trust and confidence, entitling the employees affected by this delay to resign and claim constructive dismissal. However, that is a more difficult claim to raise in these circumstances as the employees would effectively be claiming that their contract was breached by their employer not dismissing them, which is the reverse of the usual constructive dismissal argument. Paul |
|||