Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Collective bargainingLatest NewsIndustrial action / strikesTrade unionsOutsourcing

Outsourced workers lose collective bargaining bid

by Jo Faragher 26 Mar 2019
by Jo Faragher 26 Mar 2019 Outsourced workers at the University of London protest last June
Peter Marshall/Imageslive Via Zuma Wire/REX/Shutterstock
Outsourced workers at the University of London protest last June
Peter Marshall/Imageslive Via Zuma Wire/REX/Shutterstock

The High Court has dismissed a case brought by the Independent Workers’ Union of Great Britain (IWGB), which claimed that outsourced employees should be able to negotiate pay and conditions with the employers they work for.

The IWGB brought the collective bargaining case to the High Court on Monday on behalf of 75 workers, including security guards, post room workers and porters who work for Cordant, a security company contracted to the University of London.

Collective bargaining

Collective bargaining 

Joint employer concept to be tested in High Court 

The union claims that the university is the de facto employer of the outsourced workers, as well as Cordant, so they should be able to negotiate terms and conditions directly.

The IWGB initially brought the landmark case to the Central Arbitration Committee (CAC) in November 2017, but the CAC ruled that the union could not be recognised for collective bargaining purposes.

Outsourced cleaners, post room staff and other workers then went on strike in protest, and in August 2018, the High Court granted permission for a judicial review.

The union claimed that Article 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights permits workers the right to join trade unions and collectively bargain with their employers.

But at the High Court this week, Mr Justice Supperstone ruled that this was not a breach of human rights law and dismissed the union’s case.

He said: “There is, in my view, relevant and sufficient reasons for limiting the right to compulsory collective bargaining to workers and their employers.”

He added that the University of London was within its rights to outsource work to companies “in the most efficient and beneficial manner”.

If the union had won the case, this could have opened the floodgates for the 3.3 million outsourced workers in the UK to demand collective bargaining rights.

Julian Pilling, CEO of payroll company Solutio UK, said of the decision: “The protection of workers’ rights is of the utmost importance. A line must be drawn in the sand with regards to the rights of agency workers and permanent employers.

“Concise law is essential in this area in order to avoid the continual legal battles between unions and employers.”

IWGB’s general secretary Jason Moyer-Lee said the union would “continue to fight in both the courts and the workplace until they are brought in-house and treated equally with their directly employed colleagues”.

Jo Faragher
Jo Faragher

Jo Faragher has been an employment and business journalist for 20 years. She regularly contributes to Personnel Today and writes features for a number of national business and membership magazines. Jo is also the author of 'Good Work, Great Technology', published in 2022 by Clink Street Publishing, charting the relationship between effective workplace technology and productive and happy employees. She won the Willis Towers Watson HR journalist of the year award in 2015 and has been highly commended twice.

previous post
Engineer lets rip at flatulent manager in bid for compensation
next post
Sedentary working linked to a tenth of deaths

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

You may also like

Toxic culture at immigration centre saw staff abuse...

19 Sep 2023

EU-derived equal pay protections to be safeguarded

30 Aug 2023

Union needs more understanding of Vodafone Three merger...

15 Jun 2023

Is insourcing the latest trend in public sector...

20 Feb 2023

Trade body for outsourcing providers launched

6 Jan 2021

From compliance to compassion: research shows how priorities...

16 Dec 2020

Remote working could lead to jobs being pushed...

23 Nov 2020

Are cleaning services ready for the frontline?

15 May 2020

Outsourcers pool staff over public sector Covid-19 challenge

27 Mar 2020

Key London NHS trust to directly employ 1,000...

31 Jan 2020

  • Discover the value of CIPD accreditation PROMOTED | See how the CIPD can increase your earning potential...Read more
  • What does it mean to be an HR professional in 2024? (survey) PROMOTED | The world of HR is changing rapidly...Read more
  • The Contractor Management Mastery Pack: Everything you need to manage and pay global contractors PROMOTED | Answers to cross-border...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2023

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2023 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+