Personnel Today
  • OHW+
  • Resources
    • Clinical governance
    • Disability
    • Ergonomics
    • Health surveillance
    • OH employment law
    • OH service delivery
    • Research
    • Return to work and rehabilitation
    • Sickness absence management
    • Wellbeing and health promotion
  • Conditions
    • Mental health
    • Musculoskeletal disorders
    • Blood pressure
    • Cancer
    • Cardiac
    • Dementia
    • Diabetes
    • Respiratory
    • Stroke
  • CPD
  • Webinars
  • Jobs
  • Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • OHW+
  • Resources
    • Clinical governance
    • Disability
    • Ergonomics
    • Health surveillance
    • OH employment law
    • OH service delivery
    • Research
    • Return to work and rehabilitation
    • Sickness absence management
    • Wellbeing and health promotion
  • Conditions
    • Mental health
    • Musculoskeletal disorders
    • Blood pressure
    • Cancer
    • Cardiac
    • Dementia
    • Diabetes
    • Respiratory
    • Stroke
  • CPD
  • Webinars
  • Jobs
  • Personnel Today

WellbeingOccupational HealthOpinion

Hands-on approach to clinical assessment

by Dr Richard Preece 7 Mar 2008
by Dr Richard Preece 7 Mar 2008

How often should OH practitioners lay hands on our patients? This question has been much in my mind in the past few weeks. Here are some of the things that have led me to reflect.


n A manager asks two practitioners why a worker with back pain wasn’t examined. The first argues that all patients should be examined. The second argues that straight leg raising and toe touching have nothing to do with work and add little.


n A tribunal chair asks why a patient’s mental state wasn’t thoroughly assessed even though the practitioner has clearly recorded that the patient thought she was fully able to do her job (and still does). While a report on English and Welsh Disability Tribunals showed that it was extremely uncommon for evidence from OH practitioners to be heard.


n A patient resumes work after two years ‘medical suspension’ waiting for an assessment that’s never happened because the focus switched to a work assessment rather than a specialist clinical assessment.


n A specialist examination candidate begins an answer with “Of course, I’d start with a thorough history and examination”


There appear to be persuasive arguments that would lead me to examine more and equally good ones that lead me to examine less.


If the proponents of examine everyone are right then telephone assessment must be fundamentally flawed. However, while compelling “medical evidence” of the merits of telephone assessment may not be available, plenty of data is available that suggests this is successful (at least as part of a comprehensive OH service).


In addition it would be extremely hard to justify telephone services for those with acute needs, such as NHS Direct, NHS 24 and employee assistance programmes. Intuitively we accept these are valuable.


I have always found the supermarket question more valuable than clinical examination. Can the patient drive the car, push a trolley, walk 600 metres, reach the top and bottom shelves, queue, load and unload the car, and risk socialising? Even now I haven’t been able to think of a job that involves bending to touch toes.


On the contrary, my colleagues in moving and handling spend all their time advising against exactly this. In my experience the capacity to bend over at work is linked more to metaphorical and unsavoury interactions with the boss than it is to job performance.


I can’t think of any ‘medical evidence’ that robustly shows that clinical examination is linked to job performance while there is plenty of evidence that shows that a lot of sickness absence is not the result of sickness. On that basis, why bother with clinical examination at all? Then again I haven’t seen any that shows that talking to patients is linked to outcome either. (And I have seen evidence of benefit for cognitive behaviour therapy done by a computer and evidence that the health of the population has been transformed by public health practitioners without clinical examinations.)


I’ve heard one eminent practitioner argue that occupational health is public health for the workforce. I’ve heard another argue that it is primarily a clinical specialty.


Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

So here’s the answer. This week I should definitely examine patients less, more or the same. If you can help narrow down the options then let our editor know.


Dr Richard Preece is a consultant occupational physician

Dr Richard Preece

previous post
Occupational health’s duty of care to employees
next post
HR must address financial education for employees

You may also like

Workplace stress: Why it’s time to rebrand resilience

22 May 2025

Uncertainty over law hampering legal use of medical...

20 May 2025

Employers ‘worryingly’ ignorant about stress risk assessments

20 May 2025

Awareness weeks fuel spike in demand for mental...

19 May 2025

Culture, ‘micro-incivilities’ and invisible talent

14 May 2025

Healthcare workers prioritise mental health support in new...

12 May 2025

Preparing for a new era of workforce planning...

8 May 2025

Rethinking talent: Who was never considered in the...

7 May 2025

Eight ways to best support grieving employees

6 May 2025

Two-thirds of school leaders suffering mental ill health

6 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • OHW+
  • Resources
    • Clinical governance
    • Disability
    • Ergonomics
    • Health surveillance
    • OH employment law
    • OH service delivery
    • Research
    • Return to work and rehabilitation
    • Sickness absence management
    • Wellbeing and health promotion
  • Conditions
    • Mental health
    • Musculoskeletal disorders
    • Blood pressure
    • Cancer
    • Cardiac
    • Dementia
    • Diabetes
    • Respiratory
    • Stroke
  • CPD
  • Webinars
  • Jobs
  • Personnel Today