Personnel Today
  • OHW+
  • Join
  • Resources
    • Clinical governance
    • Disability
    • Ergonomics
    • Health surveillance
    • OH employment law
    • OH service delivery
    • Research
    • Return to work and rehabilitation
    • Sickness absence management
    • Wellbeing and health promotion
  • Conditions
    • Mental health
    • Musculoskeletal disorders
    • Blood pressure
    • Cancer
    • Cardiac
    • Dementia
    • Diabetes
    • Respiratory
    • Stroke
  • CPD
  • Webinars
  • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
  • Personnel Today

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • OHW+
  • Join
  • Resources
    • Clinical governance
    • Disability
    • Ergonomics
    • Health surveillance
    • OH employment law
    • OH service delivery
    • Research
    • Return to work and rehabilitation
    • Sickness absence management
    • Wellbeing and health promotion
  • Conditions
    • Mental health
    • Musculoskeletal disorders
    • Blood pressure
    • Cancer
    • Cardiac
    • Dementia
    • Diabetes
    • Respiratory
    • Stroke
  • CPD
  • Webinars
  • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
  • Personnel Today

Health and safetyWellbeing

Criminal injuries compensation: Footing the bill for violent crime

by Personnel Today 8 Feb 2006
by Personnel Today 8 Feb 2006

The government has recently published proposals to reform the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme. One idea is that victims attacked during the course of their employment should be compensated by their employers, rather than by the state.

Under current rules the scheme compensates all victims of violent crime according to the severity of the injuries they sustain. The victim is also entitled to recover loss of earnings up to 500,000.

Protection
Many victims of violent crime awarded compensation under the scheme are injured during the course of their employment. They include public sector employees such as police officers, prison officers and hospital workers, and employees in the private sector, such as bank staff and security guards.

The government consultation paper asserts that the scheme, in its current form, could be seen to act as a disincentive for employers to make the workplace safe and do everything reasonably possible to protect employees.

The proposals suggest that where an employee suffers injury as a consequence of violent crime at work, whether or not reasonable steps have been taken to prevent attacks or protect staff, the employer will be required to compensate the employee.

Insurance
They further state: “There is an argument for saying that employers are best placed to protect employees and minimise the risk to them – and should, through their insurance or otherwise, bear the risk and cost of compensating them for injuries if they fail to do so.”

Under such proposals every employer would be required to act as an insurer for staff who are attacked during the course of their employment, whether or not they have taken reasonable care.

The ramifications of a change of this magnitude cannot be overstated. Currently, employers have a common law duty to take reasonable care towards their employees and are subject to a raft of health and safety regulations de-signed to protect employees in the workplace. Despite complying with common law and statutory duties, an employer would still be liable to compensate an employee who was the subject of an unforeseeable act of violence committed by a third party.

For example, a small courier company sends its driver to deliver parcels. If the driver is hijacked and robbed and during the attack is seriously injured to the extent that he cannot work again, a claim would currently be met by the scheme and capped at 500,000.

The employer would only be liable if it could be established it had failed to take reasonable care or had failed to comply with a statutory duty such as the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999.

Cost
But under the new proposals the employer would be required to compensate that driver, even though it had complied with those duties, and would face a crippling bill if uninsured.

In the public sector the costs would be met from existing budgets unless new money was made available. In the private sector the costs would be met by either the employer or by its insurers. Small employers in particular would be hit hard.

At present many small employers find the costs of employer liability insurance inordinately expensive. This proposal would add to the cost and possibly amount to another tax on business.

It is, in effect, transferring a liability previously met by the state – and contributed to by all taxpayers – to the individual business. A failure to obtain such insurance (assuming it is not required to be compulsory) could, in the event of a violent attack on a staff member, potentially cripple a business.

Jeffrey Jupp is a barrister in the commercial and employment group at Severn Bedford Row Chambers

Employers have until 1 March to make their views known: www.cjsonline.gov.uk

Employers to face liability for victims of crime at work www.personneltoday.com/33001.article

Nightmare on high street www.personneltoday.com/32354.article

Conflict management: when colleagues turn www.personneltoday.com/29773.article


Avatar
Personnel Today

previous post
City sees IT recruitment boom
next post
Transsexuals in the workplace: Crossing the gender divide

You may also like

Occupational health key to helping employers manage long...

23 May 2022

Nurses leaving due to pressure and workplace culture

18 May 2022

Crumbling school buildings ‘risk to life’ suggests leak

16 May 2022

‘Gulf War Syndrome’ caused by release of nerve...

13 May 2022

Workers feeing increasingly anxious, burnt out and fearful...

13 May 2022

Spain plans menstrual leave for painful periods

13 May 2022

How employers can support women during the HRT...

13 May 2022

What it really means to be mentally fit

13 May 2022

What is employee wellbeing? Gethin Nadin talks to...

13 May 2022

The seven dimensions of wellness at work (webinar)

12 May 2022

  • The importance of being an ethical leader and how to become one PROMOTED | What is ethical leadership?...Read more
  • RPO Report: 2022, The Year to Outsource PROMOTED | Employers should be overwhelmed with choice...Read more
  • Report: Enabling organisational agility through talent & people success PROMOTED | Work has been challenged...Read more
  • Employee Trends 2022 report PROMOTED | Edenred research on employees analysed the key employees’ trends for 2022...Read more
  • How finance apprenticeships can boost business PROMOTED | As the world’s most forward-thinking professional accountancy body...Read more
  • Paul Devoy: Showing appreciation to the Investors in People community PROMOTED | Ask most people what comes to mind when you mention Investors in People...Read more
  • White paper: How digitalisation can support evolving occupational health PROMOTED | Download this free white paper to discover how digitalisation can help occupational health meet emerging challenges...Read more

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • OHW+
  • Join
  • Resources
    • Clinical governance
    • Disability
    • Ergonomics
    • Health surveillance
    • OH employment law
    • OH service delivery
    • Research
    • Return to work and rehabilitation
    • Sickness absence management
    • Wellbeing and health promotion
  • Conditions
    • Mental health
    • Musculoskeletal disorders
    • Blood pressure
    • Cancer
    • Cardiac
    • Dementia
    • Diabetes
    • Respiratory
    • Stroke
  • CPD
  • Webinars
  • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
  • Personnel Today