Personnel Today
  • OHW+
  • Resources
    • Clinical governance
    • Disability
    • Ergonomics
    • Health surveillance
    • OH employment law
    • OH service delivery
    • Research
    • Return to work and rehabilitation
    • Sickness absence management
    • Wellbeing and health promotion
  • Conditions
    • Mental health
    • Musculoskeletal disorders
    • Blood pressure
    • Cancer
    • Cardiac
    • Dementia
    • Diabetes
    • Respiratory
    • Stroke
  • CPD
  • Webinars
  • Jobs
  • Personnel Today

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • OHW+
  • Resources
    • Clinical governance
    • Disability
    • Ergonomics
    • Health surveillance
    • OH employment law
    • OH service delivery
    • Research
    • Return to work and rehabilitation
    • Sickness absence management
    • Wellbeing and health promotion
  • Conditions
    • Mental health
    • Musculoskeletal disorders
    • Blood pressure
    • Cancer
    • Cardiac
    • Dementia
    • Diabetes
    • Respiratory
    • Stroke
  • CPD
  • Webinars
  • Jobs
  • Personnel Today

Health and safetyWellbeing

Lawyers highlight effects of new health and safety law

by Personnel Today 28 Jan 2009
by Personnel Today 28 Jan 2009

The Health and Safety (Offences) Act 2008 has quietly progressed through the Houses of Parliament and comes into force this week with strict new workplace safety rules.
 
The Act is set to increase penalties for health and safety law and provide both the courts with greater sentencing powers when it comes into force on Friday 16th January.
 
In stark contrast to the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007, the new Act has quietly progressed through the Houses of Parliament.
 
Rachael Histed, Associate at DLA Piper, explains: “The objective of both the Government and the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), has been to raise the maximum penalties for health and safety offences so that they become a sufficient deterrent and appropriately deal with individuals who flout health and safety legislation.
 
“Under health and safety law, any individual in the workplace including employees, management and directors can be prosecuted for health and safety offences. Previously most breaches of health and safety regulations were subject to a fine not exceeding £5,000 in the Magistrates Courts, however the new laws significantly increase the maximum fine to £20,000.”
 
The new laws will also make imprisonment an option for more health and safety offences without the need for indictment and will make certain offences that were previously only triable in the Magistrates Courts, triable in Crown Courts too, which can result in larger fines and longer sentences.
 
According to HSE Chair Judith Hackett there are “no changes” to businesses existing legal duties under the Act, but businesses should continue to be vigilant.
 
Said Histed: “Whilst the HSE has commented that “good employers and good managers have nothing to fear”, given that there is a real possibility of two year jail sentences being imposed which can be accompanied by an unlimited fine, directors and individuals in management in particular, should be even more concerned to ensure that health and safety obligations are fulfilled.

“Individuals should pay particular attention to their own duties in relation to health and safety whilst management would be well advised to satisfy themselves that adequate and effective systems and procedures are in place and are being followed within their businesses.

“Once in force, it will be interesting to see whether the HSE changes its standard approach to investigating offences in order to personalise responsibility and bring more prosecutions.
 
“The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions believes that ‘the courts are right to call for the availability of the penalty of imprisonment for the most serious offences’.

“Even more caution will need to be exercised when responding to the HSE and/or Police where Corporate Manslaughter is being investigated, for example, as it is quite conceivable that proceedings will be considered against corporate entities and individuals at the same time”,  adds Histed.
 
These tougher sentencing powers which permit the imprisonment of individuals may conflict with aspects of European human rights law.

Explains Histed: “Individual defendants facing the possibility of imprisonment may be confronted by what is termed a ‘reverse burden of proof’. As health and safety law stands, where the duty holder is required to do something ‘so far as is practicable’ or ‘so far as is reasonably practicable’ the burden is on the defendant to prove that it was not practicable or reasonably practicable to have done more than was in fact done.

“This brings into play the presumption of innocence within the European Convention on Human Rights and whilst the courts have already held that the reverse burden of proof is compatible, it remains to be seen as to whether a legal challenge against the Act will be made on this basis.”

The importance of obtaining legal advice at an early juncture should not be underestimated.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Accidents, incidents and raids can occur when and where least expected, and if not handled correctly from the outset, they can have instant and dramatic impact on business, its reputation and the livelihoods of employees.

DLA Piper has a unique Rapid Response service, which provides critical support when and where it is most needed.

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Gloomy job prospects for car workers despite Mandelson’s support package
next post
Local Employment Partnership awards shortlist includes high street big names

You may also like

Welfare cuts would ‘undermine workforce inclusion and business...

27 Jun 2025

One in four young workers rate mental health...

17 Jun 2025

CIPD Festival of Work: ‘Wellbeing is not an...

11 Jun 2025

Employers must offer more flexibility to working carers,...

9 Jun 2025

CIPD: A quarter feel work has negative impact...

9 Jun 2025

Why cash lump sums may not be the...

5 Jun 2025

Sickness absence falls to almost pre-pandemic rate

4 Jun 2025

One-third have witnessed substance abuse at work

3 Jun 2025

Preparing for a new era of workforce planning...

3 Jun 2025

Three ways technology can boost wellbeing outcomes

27 May 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • OHW+
  • Resources
    • Clinical governance
    • Disability
    • Ergonomics
    • Health surveillance
    • OH employment law
    • OH service delivery
    • Research
    • Return to work and rehabilitation
    • Sickness absence management
    • Wellbeing and health promotion
  • Conditions
    • Mental health
    • Musculoskeletal disorders
    • Blood pressure
    • Cancer
    • Cardiac
    • Dementia
    • Diabetes
    • Respiratory
    • Stroke
  • CPD
  • Webinars
  • Jobs
  • Personnel Today