Personnel Today
  • OHW+
  • Resources
    • Clinical governance
    • Disability
    • Ergonomics
    • Health surveillance
    • OH employment law
    • OH service delivery
    • Research
    • Return to work and rehabilitation
    • Sickness absence management
    • Wellbeing and health promotion
  • Conditions
    • Mental health
    • Musculoskeletal disorders
    • Blood pressure
    • Cancer
    • Cardiac
    • Dementia
    • Diabetes
    • Respiratory
    • Stroke
  • CPD
  • Webinars
  • Jobs
  • Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • OHW+
  • Resources
    • Clinical governance
    • Disability
    • Ergonomics
    • Health surveillance
    • OH employment law
    • OH service delivery
    • Research
    • Return to work and rehabilitation
    • Sickness absence management
    • Wellbeing and health promotion
  • Conditions
    • Mental health
    • Musculoskeletal disorders
    • Blood pressure
    • Cancer
    • Cardiac
    • Dementia
    • Diabetes
    • Respiratory
    • Stroke
  • CPD
  • Webinars
  • Jobs
  • Personnel Today

WellbeingOccupational HealthOpinion

Nursing and Midwifery Council needs to get real about occupational health

by Graham Johnson 2 Jan 2008
by Graham Johnson 2 Jan 2008

We’ve been at it for almost 130 years now, and it’s all down to Phillipa Flowerday – the nurse from the mustard factory who taught the UK workforce to look after their occupational health and wellbeing. And it is 73 years ago since the Royal College of Nursing’s first Industrial Nursing Course began, supported by funds from the Ministry of Labour and National Service (oh happy days) when, as a result of the post-war increase in factory production, the need for ‘industrial nurses’ was identified.


We all accept that change is one of the only true certainties in life, and in terms of professional registration, oh my have we seen some changes over the years. One of them was the introduction of part three of the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) register, which has not been without its troubles for the OH nursing fraternity.


Now my career is important to me, and I’m sure yours is to you, too, and when we achieved our OH qualification and eagerly waited for migration on to part three, we thought we had arrived. A specialist nurse? No – never! I recall us all asking: has the NMC finally recognised our knowledge, skills, experience, and contribution to the nation’s health? Is this a milestone in the history of nursing?


Well, perhaps for some, but not for all. You see, you may have the piece of paper duly signed, but then you search the NMC register and – shock horror – the much-worked for OH qualification is not recorded on part three.


You contact the NMC, and ask the obvious question: “What happened?” And then you wait, and you wait, and you receive a reply that they are ‘looking into it’. In the meantime, you think about that plumb job advertised in Occupational Health, prepare your CV, and attend the interview. You get the job offer, and then you hear that your prospective employer is questioning the statement on your CV that you are a specialist community public health nurse (SCPHN). You know you are – you have the scars to prove it – but that is not enough.


The number of OH practitioners to whom this scenario applies is unknown, so come on, NMC – you owe us an explanation.


The issues posed in Occupational Health by Andrew Nicholl (Letters, July 2007), questioning the NMC’s stance on nurse education in OH, are a demonstration perhaps of the NMC’s naivety about our specialty. I am the first to applaud and support the role of the practice teachers and the supporting standards required, especially the need for an appropriate level and due process in terms of mentorship. However, as approximately 70% of the nurses employed in our specialty work outside the NHS, we must ask whether our employers, particularly those in the private sector, will be willing or able to support the extensive mentorship preparation in supporting students, and be in a position to support the requirement that SCPHN students are supernumerary. Would someone please explain to the employer or the lone practitioner how this is supposed to work?


The current lack of suitably qualified practice teachers is a challenge for the profession, and encouragement to those with the desire, time and skills to undertake this task is to be welcomed. But in the interim, until sufficient numbers of OH practice teachers become available, are we happy to accept the NMC’s suggestion that other members of the SCPHN fraternity, such as school nurses or health visitors, could be allowed to confirm the competency of the student OH nurse? Come on NMC, get real!


Until such time as we have enough qualified practice teachers, I would encourage you to support OH students and the universities seeking potential practice teachers. Doing so will ensure that we maintain the value we hold on our specialty, and develop the unique relationship between mentor and student, allowing exposure to a range of OH environments and skills ensuring that the future SCPHN is fit for purpose, and can add value to the maintenance of the health and wellbeing of UK plc.


So, NMC, perhaps now is the time for a bit of reflection, so that you can make a good go of Not Messing [up] my Career.


Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

By Graham Johnson, operations manager, Bupa Wellness


This is Graham Johnson’s personal view.

Graham Johnson

Graham Johnson is clinical lead - nursing, at Bupa Health Clinics

previous post
Occupational health news in brief
next post
Skills secretary John Denham calls for training push in 2008

You may also like

Third in north west fear ill health will...

2 Jul 2025

Welfare cuts would ‘undermine workforce inclusion and business...

27 Jun 2025

Supporting employees through substance abuse

24 Jun 2025

One in four young workers rate mental health...

17 Jun 2025

Workplace disputes: ‘Most employment tribunals could be avoided’

12 Jun 2025

CIPD Festival of Work: ‘Wellbeing is not an...

11 Jun 2025

How employers can support cancer carers better

11 Jun 2025

Two-thirds of workers still struggling to access GPs...

10 Jun 2025

Employers must offer more flexibility to working carers,...

9 Jun 2025

CIPD: A quarter feel work has negative impact...

9 Jun 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • OHW+
  • Resources
    • Clinical governance
    • Disability
    • Ergonomics
    • Health surveillance
    • OH employment law
    • OH service delivery
    • Research
    • Return to work and rehabilitation
    • Sickness absence management
    • Wellbeing and health promotion
  • Conditions
    • Mental health
    • Musculoskeletal disorders
    • Blood pressure
    • Cancer
    • Cardiac
    • Dementia
    • Diabetes
    • Respiratory
    • Stroke
  • CPD
  • Webinars
  • Jobs
  • Personnel Today