This month’s crop of occupational health research papers includes a study showing that a quarter of UK workers would not take a day off sick unless they were hospitalised or had no other choice.
Employees reluctant to take sick leave
Almost a quarter of UK workers, or seven million people, would not take a day off sick unless they were hospitalised or had no other choice, according to research by Canada Life Group Insurance. Nine in ten of those responding to the survey say they have gone into work when feeling ill, “suggesting employers’ efforts to improve wellbeing are failing to reduce presenteeism among employees”, the insurer reports.
Almost half of respondents would go into work with a stomach bug and, not surprisingly, a similar proportion state that they have become unwell due to a colleague’s illness on more than one occasion. The main reasons employees give for going into work ill is that they do not feel their illness warrants a day off and/or their workload is too great for them to take time off.
https://www.canadalife.co.uk/news/1-in-4-uk-workers-sick-day
Half of charity staff experience violence or aggression
Almost half of staff working for charities and housing associations have experienced violence or aggression at work, either from people using the services or from colleagues, according to research from the union, Unison.
A quarter feel unsupported when working alone and many feel in danger due to a lack of training or managerial support. More than three quarters of the sample (79%) also report being stressed because of their work.
“Unison community health and safety survey”, June 2017.
Investing in health is good for shift workers
Shift workers face particular barriers when they try to lead healthier lifestyles, but employers can do much to facilitate this aim, according to focus-group based research.
The authors of the study conclude that investing in employee health is particularly beneficial for shift workers, who face increased risks to their health. Adopting organisational policies and changes to the workplace environment as a core strategy for workplace health promotion may create an environment that makes healthier choices more accessible to all employees, they add.
“A qualitative exploration of the shift work experience: the perceived barriers and facilitators to a healthier lifestyle and the role of the workplace environment”, F M Nea et al, Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, published online 20 October 2017.
Long hours impacts film industry health
More than nine out of 10 crew personnel involved in shooting films report that they have felt unsafe at work, or travelling to and from work, because of tiredness, according to research from the union, Bectu.
More than four out of five believe that the long-hours culture in the film and TV industry impacts on their ability to do their job and nearly 90% feel that working long hours has a negative effect on their family lives.
“Eyes half shut”, Bectu, October 2017.
Poor health and job automation
Employees with poor health are at greatest risk of losing their jobs as a result of technological change, according to this Norwegian study.
This is because they are over-represented in occupations most likely to be automated, the research finds. For example, the risk of job automation is 57% for men with long-standing illnesses, compared with a risk of only 50% for men as a whole. This elevated risk remains significant for men after controlling for education and income.
“Poor health as a potential risk factor for job loss due to automation: the case of Norway”, P Hessel et al, Occupational & Environmental Medicine, published online 13 October 2017.
Social context important in return-to-work
The social aspects of an employee’s life can influence the way in which they manage a return to work after a cancer diagnosis, according to this study of 23 patients. The support workers receive from colleagues and from those beyond the workplace, together with comparisons employees make with other cancer patients in deciding on their own readiness to return, are critical.
“Cancer survivors’ social context in the return to work process: narrative accounts of social support and social comparison information”, M Armaou et al, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, published online 4 October 2017.
Chemical-induced hearing loss
Workers who are simultaneously exposed to noise and certain chemicals at work are at risk of greater hearing loss than those exposed to noise alone. This is the finding of a study of 1,266 shipyard workers who were divided into four exposure groups based on their levels of exposure to noise and a range of chemicals including lead, cadmium, arsenic and xylene.
Hearing changes in the period 2004 to 2015 were significantly worse for the groups exposed to high levels of noise and metals/solvents compared with the low exposure group. The authors conclude that hearing conservation programmes should take into consideration combined exposures to metals, solvents and noise, not only noise.
“Chemical induced hearing loss in shipyard workers”, N C Schaal et al, Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, published online 4 October 2017.
“Good work” and ill-health exit
Chronically ill workers have an increased risk of work exit, including through ill health retirement, and chronic disease is an obstacle to extended working lives, according to this follow-up of the Whitehall II study of civil servants.
Factors reducing the risk that chronic disease leads to an early exit from work include high levels of work-based social support and high skill discretion in midlife.
“Can favourable psychosocial working conditions in midlife moderate the risk of work exit for chronically ill workers? A 20-year follow-up of the Whitehall II study”, M Fleischmann et al, Occupational & Environmental Medicine, published online 17 October 2017.
Common mental health disorders and return-to-work
Previous episodes of common mental disorders (CMD) and more serious symptoms of mental ill health make it less likely that an employee will return to work as a result of psychological disorders, according to this overview of 71 articles on prognostic factors and sickness absence.
Other predictors of sickness absence in people with CMDs are co-morbidity, high job demands, low job control, lower educational level, smoking and low perceived general health. Conversely, earlier return-to-work is consistently predicted by lower symptom severity, having no previous spells of absence, being younger and having a positive outlook on rehabilitation.
“Determinants of sickness absence and return to work among employees with common mental disorders: a scoping review”, H de Vries et al, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, published online 4 October 2017
