Personnel Today
  • OHW+
  • Resources
    • Clinical governance
    • Disability
    • Ergonomics
    • Health surveillance
    • OH employment law
    • OH service delivery
    • Research
    • Return to work and rehabilitation
    • Sickness absence management
    • Wellbeing and health promotion
  • Conditions
    • Mental health
    • Musculoskeletal disorders
    • Blood pressure
    • Cancer
    • Cardiac
    • Dementia
    • Diabetes
    • Respiratory
    • Stroke
  • CPD
  • Webinars
  • Jobs
  • Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • OHW+
  • Resources
    • Clinical governance
    • Disability
    • Ergonomics
    • Health surveillance
    • OH employment law
    • OH service delivery
    • Research
    • Return to work and rehabilitation
    • Sickness absence management
    • Wellbeing and health promotion
  • Conditions
    • Mental health
    • Musculoskeletal disorders
    • Blood pressure
    • Cancer
    • Cardiac
    • Dementia
    • Diabetes
    • Respiratory
    • Stroke
  • CPD
  • Webinars
  • Jobs
  • Personnel Today

ResearchHealth surveillanceHealth and safetyOccupational Health

Contaminants on employees’ clothing is a public health hazard, researchers say

by Ashleigh Webber 29 Jan 2020
by Ashleigh Webber 29 Jan 2020 Shutterstock
Shutterstock

Toxic contaminants are inadvertently being brought home from employees’ workplaces and potentially exposing their families to dangerous substances, according to experts.

A review by Boston University School of Public Health (BUSPH) and the Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health is calling for “take home” exposures to be recognised as a public health hazard.

It has suggested that, although the level of contaminants being brought home on employees’ clothing, for example, is likely to be low, when they build up – or come from two or three sources – they can be enough to harm health or the development of workers’ children.

The review said the issue was not simply a case of worker carelessness, but was sometimes associated with “precarious” working arrangements, where staff feel they could lose their jobs if they raised concerns about their working conditions and any breaches of health and safety regulations.

The review’s author, Dr Diana Ceballos, who is assistant professor of environmental health at BUSPH, said: “To prevent the chronic, low-level, take-home exposures that are particularly harmful for developing children, a multi-tier intervention approach including interventions at the workplace, home, and community levels are needed.

“Although OSHA [the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, part of the United States Department of Labor] does regulate some key workplace exposures that can become take-home exposures, such as asbestos, lead, and pesticides, often regulations are not up to date or enforced enough to be protective of health at the family level.”

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The study, ‘Eliminating Take-Home Exposures: Recognizing the Role of Occupational Health and Safety in Broader Community Health’, has been published in the Annals of Work Exposures and Health journal.

In 2019, a study into pesticide exposure among horticultural workers found that contamination can take place despite the provision of protective equipment.

Ashleigh Webber

Ashleigh is a former editor of OHW+ and former HR and wellbeing editor at Personnel Today. Ashleigh's areas of interest include employee health and wellbeing, equality and inclusion and skills development. She has hosted many webinars for Personnel Today, on topics including employee retention, financial wellbeing and menopause support.

previous post
New-look training could be on the cards for OH, as NMC outlines review of SCPHN standards
next post
Newcastle City Council tops LGBT+ inclusion list

You may also like

Decline in workplace deaths: falls from height remain...

3 Jul 2025

Aircrew with cancer pursuing MoD for compensation –...

2 Jul 2025

Why cash lump sums may not be the...

5 Jun 2025

Employers ‘worryingly’ ignorant about stress risk assessments

20 May 2025

Warning of diabetes risk for workplace drivers

11 Apr 2025

Calls growing for UK national asbestos register

4 Apr 2025

Sexual harassment: Employees have the right to protection...

18 Mar 2025

One in seven NHS staff physically attacked last...

14 Mar 2025

HSE new guidance to protect against hospital nitrous...

10 Feb 2025

Two-step testing enabling more train drivers to work...

24 Jan 2025

  • Empower and engage for the future: A revolution in talent development (webinar) WEBINAR | As organisations strive...Read more
  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • OHW+
  • Resources
    • Clinical governance
    • Disability
    • Ergonomics
    • Health surveillance
    • OH employment law
    • OH service delivery
    • Research
    • Return to work and rehabilitation
    • Sickness absence management
    • Wellbeing and health promotion
  • Conditions
    • Mental health
    • Musculoskeletal disorders
    • Blood pressure
    • Cancer
    • Cardiac
    • Dementia
    • Diabetes
    • Respiratory
    • Stroke
  • CPD
  • Webinars
  • Jobs
  • Personnel Today