Personnel Today
  • OHW+
  • Resources
    • Clinical governance
    • Disability
    • Ergonomics
    • Health surveillance
    • OH employment law
    • OH service delivery
    • Research
    • Return to work and rehabilitation
    • Sickness absence management
    • Wellbeing and health promotion
  • Conditions
    • Mental health
    • Musculoskeletal disorders
    • Blood pressure
    • Cancer
    • Cardiac
    • Dementia
    • Diabetes
    • Respiratory
    • Stroke
  • CPD
  • Webinars
  • Jobs
  • Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • OHW+
  • Resources
    • Clinical governance
    • Disability
    • Ergonomics
    • Health surveillance
    • OH employment law
    • OH service delivery
    • Research
    • Return to work and rehabilitation
    • Sickness absence management
    • Wellbeing and health promotion
  • Conditions
    • Mental health
    • Musculoskeletal disorders
    • Blood pressure
    • Cancer
    • Cardiac
    • Dementia
    • Diabetes
    • Respiratory
    • Stroke
  • CPD
  • Webinars
  • Jobs
  • Personnel Today

Case lawHealth and safetyLatest NewsOccupational Health

Supreme Court rules former Johnson Matthey employees entitled to compensation

by Ashleigh Webber 21 Mar 2018
by Ashleigh Webber 21 Mar 2018 The Leigh Day team and former Johnson Matthey employees Simon York, Waynsworth Dryden and Tony Cipullo
Image: Leigh Day
The Leigh Day team and former Johnson Matthey employees Simon York, Waynsworth Dryden and Tony Cipullo
Image: Leigh Day

The Supreme Court has ruled that three former employees of chemicals company Johnson Matthey should be compensated after they developed a sensitivity to platinum salts which led to them being dismissed on medical grounds.

The landmark ruling means that employees may be entitled to claim compensation if their employer’s negligence has caused a physiological change in the body, even if it is symptomless, and that change has resulted in the loss of their job.

The case, Dryden and others v Johnson Matthey, concerned three former employees who worked for Johnson Matthey making catalytic converters. The company failed to ensure its factories in Royston and Brimsdown were properly cleaned and, as a result, the workers were exposed to platinum salts which led them to develop a sensitivity to the substance.

Health and safety

General health and safety duties

How to identify and manage health and safety risks

Although the condition is symptomless, further exposure to chlorinated platinum salts can cause a person to develop an allergic reaction, which might cause irritation to the eyes, chest and skin.

When the condition was detected, Johnson Matthey dismissed the men from their positions in the factory and offered them either an alternative role with a reduced rate of pay or the termination of their employment, both of which had an effect on their financial situation.

The Supreme Court overturned previous decisions made by the High Court and the Court of Appeal, which decided that the men could not claim compensation against their employer as the sensitivity to platinum salts had not developed into an allergic reaction and was therefore not “actionable” – the measure by which a compensation claim can be made.

The company argued that as the employees had been removed from the factory, they would never suffer from an allergy to platinum salts as they would not come into contact with the substance.

The Supreme Court judges unanimously agreed that the former employees could make a claim for compensation as the sensitivity to the substance was undoubtedly harmful.

The judgment said: “What has happened to the claimants is that their bodily capacity for work has been impaired and they are therefore significantly worse off.

“They have suffered actionable bodily damage, or personal injury, which, given its impact on their lives, is certainly more than negligible.”

Harminder Bains, solicitor at Leigh Day – which represented the former employees – said the decision would have a wide-ranging impact on the law surrounding personal injury.

She said: “My clients are delighted with this decision from the Supreme Court and will now return to the High Court to proceed to a trial for how much their lost wages and other benefits are worth following the negligent exposure to platinum salts.

“They have lost their highly skilled jobs in these chemical plants. In addition, there are other men who, sadly, have been similarly exposed, and we will be looking to widen the claims out to all those affected.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“This landmark judgment is a clear warning to all employers that they cannot side-step their health and safety responsibilities to their employees and must not cut corners and expose other workers to hazardous working conditions.”

A Johnson Matthey spokesperson said: “Johnson Matthey notes the outcome which clarifies that the claimants, in addition to compensation payments already made to them by JM, are entitled to further compensation. JM’s priority is always to protect the health and wellbeing of our employees and we continue to review and enhance our processes to ensure this is the case.”

Ashleigh Webber

Ashleigh is a former editor of OHW+ and former HR and wellbeing editor at Personnel Today. Ashleigh's areas of interest include employee health and wellbeing, equality and inclusion and skills development. She has hosted many webinars for Personnel Today, on topics including employee retention, financial wellbeing and menopause support.

previous post
Hacking of “vulnerable” wearables and health devices could be fatal, warns report
next post
Employers forecast highest pay awards for four years

You may also like

Employers ‘worryingly’ ignorant about stress risk assessments

20 May 2025

Warning of diabetes risk for workplace drivers

11 Apr 2025

Calls growing for UK national asbestos register

4 Apr 2025

Sexual harassment: Employees have the right to protection...

18 Mar 2025

One in seven NHS staff physically attacked last...

14 Mar 2025

HSE new guidance to protect against hospital nitrous...

10 Feb 2025

Two-step testing enabling more train drivers to work...

24 Jan 2025

HSE updates guidance on silicosis risk from installing...

10 Jan 2025

Workplaces urged to revisit and refresh first aid...

6 Jan 2025

Warning of ‘catastrophic’ rise in alcohol deaths in...

20 Dec 2024

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • OHW+
  • Resources
    • Clinical governance
    • Disability
    • Ergonomics
    • Health surveillance
    • OH employment law
    • OH service delivery
    • Research
    • Return to work and rehabilitation
    • Sickness absence management
    • Wellbeing and health promotion
  • Conditions
    • Mental health
    • Musculoskeletal disorders
    • Blood pressure
    • Cancer
    • Cardiac
    • Dementia
    • Diabetes
    • Respiratory
    • Stroke
  • CPD
  • Webinars
  • Jobs
  • Personnel Today