Personnel Today
  • OHW+
  • Resources
    • Clinical governance
    • Disability
    • Ergonomics
    • Health surveillance
    • OH employment law
    • OH service delivery
    • Research
    • Return to work and rehabilitation
    • Sickness absence management
    • Wellbeing and health promotion
  • Conditions
    • Mental health
    • Musculoskeletal disorders
    • Blood pressure
    • Cancer
    • Cardiac
    • Dementia
    • Diabetes
    • Respiratory
    • Stroke
  • CPD
  • Webinars
  • Jobs
  • Personnel Today

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • OHW+
  • Resources
    • Clinical governance
    • Disability
    • Ergonomics
    • Health surveillance
    • OH employment law
    • OH service delivery
    • Research
    • Return to work and rehabilitation
    • Sickness absence management
    • Wellbeing and health promotion
  • Conditions
    • Mental health
    • Musculoskeletal disorders
    • Blood pressure
    • Cancer
    • Cardiac
    • Dementia
    • Diabetes
    • Respiratory
    • Stroke
  • CPD
  • Webinars
  • Jobs
  • Personnel Today

Health and safetyLatest NewsWellbeing

Workers with asbestos-related cancer lose Lords ruling on employers’ liability

by Michael Millar 4 May 2006
by Michael Millar 4 May 2006

Insurance companies have won a landmark case in the House of Lords that will limit employers’ liability for payouts to staff who developed asbestos-related cancer while working for them.

This means compensation payouts to sufferers of the fatal lung disease, mesothelioma, and their families will be drastically reduced in many cases and could save millions of pounds for employers.

The House of Lords upheld three test appeals in which it was argued that damages awards should be limited in cases involving several former employers, none of whom could be specifically blamed for the onset of the disease.

About 1,900 people die in the UK each year from mesothelioma.

Four years ago, in a similar claim, law lords ruled that an employer who negligently exposed a worker to asbestos could be held 100% liable even if the employee had worked for several companies and it could not be proved which of them had caused the illness.

In this appeal, it was contended that an employer’s liability should be limited on a percentage basis to reflect the extent to which it contributed to an employee’s exposure to asbestos.

Lord Hoffmann said the justification for the “joint and several” 100% liability rule established in the earlier Lords case was that, if someone caused harm, there was no reason why his liability should be reduced because someone else also caused the same harm.

But the same considerations did not apply when a person “may” have caused harm. Fairness suggested that, if more than one person “may” have been responsible, liability should be divided according to the probability that one or other caused the harm, he said.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Tom Brennan, regional secretary of the GMB, said the union would now call on government to introduce legislation “so that our members and dependants get the full compensation they deserve”.

“This decision does not do justice to all those who have suffered incapacity, death from exposure to asbestos whilst carrying out their every day job,” he said.

Michael Millar

previous post
Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service publishes dispute resolution reform paper
next post
DSG staff scoop share of £20m after SAYE scheme matures

You may also like

Number of police working second jobs doubles

15 Jul 2025

Mansion House speech: will employers’ pension contributions rise?

15 Jul 2025

University staff to strike over hybrid working curbs

15 Jul 2025

Employees voting with feet as return-to-office pressure increases...

15 Jul 2025

Businesses warned against reducing recruitment in favour of...

15 Jul 2025

Postmasters could take ownership of Post Office

14 Jul 2025

Ethnicity and disability pay gaps: Ready to report?...

14 Jul 2025

Manager dismissed after covert recording with HR wins...

14 Jul 2025

Food sector warned it is facing a workforce...

14 Jul 2025

Gregg Wallace investigation: 45 allegations upheld

14 Jul 2025

  • Empower and engage for the future: A revolution in talent development (webinar) WEBINAR | As organisations strive...Read more
  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • OHW+
  • Resources
    • Clinical governance
    • Disability
    • Ergonomics
    • Health surveillance
    • OH employment law
    • OH service delivery
    • Research
    • Return to work and rehabilitation
    • Sickness absence management
    • Wellbeing and health promotion
  • Conditions
    • Mental health
    • Musculoskeletal disorders
    • Blood pressure
    • Cancer
    • Cardiac
    • Dementia
    • Diabetes
    • Respiratory
    • Stroke
  • CPD
  • Webinars
  • Jobs
  • Personnel Today