Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Reasonable adjustmentsDisability discriminationDisabilityMental healthLegal opinion

Mental health at work: look at the causes as well as the cure

by Howard Hymanson and Charlie Thompson 1 Feb 2017
by Howard Hymanson and Charlie Thompson 1 Feb 2017

Theresa May recently pledged to tackle the stigma around mental health problems with a host of new initiatives. However, HR professionals need to consider not just how to manage employees once they become ill, but what’s behind their health issues too. Howard Hymanson and Charlie Thompson from law firm Harbottle and Lewis look at the potential benefits.

Last month, the Prime Minister unveiled plans to transform mental health support in the workplace – the latest public recognition of the rising tide of employees suffering from mental health and stress at work issues.

It remains to be seen whether or not this latest initiative will actually yield any tangible developments to assist HR professionals, who are called upon with increasing frequency to manage the challenges posed by mental health problems.

HR will always need to consider any legal risks, but these often tend to focus on potential disability discrimination issues.

Given that no qualifying service is required and there is no cap on compensation if a disability discrimination claim was successful, this is understandable.

Furthermore, disability claims tend to focus upon how the employer dealt with the employee after they became unwell, considering questions such as have reasonable adjustments been made? Has there been unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability? Has there been less favourable treatment because of disability?

Although it is important that HR keeps these questions in mind when considering how to manage mental health and stress at work issues, too often insufficient attention is given to the reason why an employee may have fallen ill in the first place.

Duty of care

Legally, it has been clear for many years that all employers have a duty of care to avoid causing “psychiatric injury” to their employees.

Just as an employer can be held liable for causing physical injuries through unsafe working conditions, so too can liability arise for personal injury in the High Court, as a result of causing an employee to sustain psychiatric injury.

However, this legal duty, in our experience, is not always fully understood or acted upon by HR professionals.

HR can sometimes be slow to recognise that occupational stressors can be a key factor in causing an employee to develop a mental health issue, or in exacerbating an existing condition.

This is surprising, as intense work pressure, excessive working hours and difficult working conditions, such as being subject to bullying or an unreasonable performance/disciplinary management process, can clearly have a catastrophic impact on an employee’s mental health. During periods of economic uncertainty, even robust employees can be at risk.

And it is not just mental health that is at risk in these situations, as being subjected to high levels of stress can also give rise to physiological disorders – The Lancet recently reported that constant stress on the brain is linked to a higher risk of heart attack, for example.

Laying the blame

As the link between work and mental illness continues to gain even greater public recognition, there is also a growing trend of employees seeking to blame their employer for breaching the duty of care to avoid causing them psychiatric injury.

However, a major area of difficulty for any employee bringing such a claim is persuading a judge (who must rely on their own experience and assessment of human nature) that the injury was reasonably foreseeable.

The court would need to ask questions, such as would a reasonable employer have foreseen that the employee was at risk of developing a psychiatric illness because of work-related factors? If they cannot pass this foreseeability test, the claim will fail.

Mental health among the working population is an increasingly accepted trend. So, as the Prime Minister calls upon employers to offer employees even greater support, judges may be more easily persuaded that psychiatric injuries are reasonably foreseeable.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Potentially, this could lead to more employees bringing and winning high value personal injury claims in the High Court, and unwary HR departments may be in for a shock.

What should HR departments do? Here are some tips:

  • Establish preventative measures, such as comprehensive training, return-to-work and exit interview programmes.
  • Proactively work with occupational health professionals to obtain practical recommendations to adopt and put into practice.
  • Look out for trends in illness and sickness absence within your workforce. These may identify high risk managers and departments, and you can then take appropriate measures to address any issues.
  • Ensure that a member of HR is accountable for being in contact with an employee who is developing a mental health issue at work. Touch base with them regularly, in an appropriate manner, as this can have a positive impact and reduce the scope for an individual to become embittered and more likely to bring a claim.
Howard Hymanson and Charlie Thompson

Howard Hymanson is a lawyer and Charlie Thompson is an associate at Harbottle & Lewis

previous post
Occupational health plays key role in Guernsey’s sickness absence and sick pay revamp
next post
Annual appraisals – good, bad or just ugly?

1 comment

Dr Ramesh 22 Oct 2017 - 9:22 pm

Our prime minister or for that matter no ministers in our country can speak with so much of insight into mental health problems,like Theresa May has spoken.We the depressed will have to look at UK for our well being because our 125 crore population has decided to ignore us and so have their elected representatives.

Comments are closed.

You may also like

Police Scotland constable who can’t work in cold...

15 Aug 2025

BA crew member too anxious to fly wins...

13 Aug 2025

Violence against A&E staff has doubled, warns RCN

12 Aug 2025

Stroke survivor settles discrimination case for £100k

8 Aug 2025

‘Knowledge gap’ fuelling stress about workers’ finances

6 Aug 2025

HR leaders back idea of wellbeing tax break

5 Aug 2025

Asset manager loses case over ‘disappointing’ £10k bonus

31 Jul 2025

Disability discrimination cases jump 41% in a year

30 Jul 2025

Most workers support disability and ethnicity pay gap...

30 Jul 2025

Neurodiversity case exposes nuance in reasonable adjustments

25 Jul 2025

  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise