Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employment law

Manslaughter Act exemptions exclude deaths of people who do not work for the organisation

by Personnel Today 6 Mar 2007
by Personnel Today 6 Mar 2007

The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act is expected to become law later this year, making it easier to prosecute negligent organisations that cause death. But the proposed Act doesn’t go far enough.

We believe there should be fewer exemptions regarding deaths of people who aren’t employed by an organisation but are killed as a result of its gross failings, and deaths abroad caused by UK-managed operations.

Active penalties

With regard to penalties, we would like to see active measures required for lasting health and safety improvements. Courts should take a broad view on remedial orders and, with advice from the Health and Safety Executive, should consider requiring convicted organisations to train senior managers to:

  • use competent health and safety advice
  • take steps to improve health and safety culture
  • explore the possible benefits of restorative justice.

Convicted organisations will need to rebuild trust and show that they have learned real lessons.

HR and health and safety staff have vital roles to play in helping employers keep their workplaces healthy and safe – saving lives and avoiding reputational damage. When deciding culpability under the new offence, juries will consider breaches of health and safety legislation and the failure to follow guidance, and may also consider attitudes or accepted practices that allowed this.

To protect workers, the organisation and the public, employers need to ensure they have effective risk-control systems and a positive health and safety culture.

Review the risks

Organisations should be taking this opportunity to review their health and safety policies, systems and practices. They should ensure they are legally compliant as a minimum, are enforcing authority guidance, and are managing their significant risks. Obvious areas for review are those where there is a higher risk of death (working at height, workplace transport and occupational road risk).

It is essential that HR and health and safety professionals help organisations develop positive cultures, with strong leadership from senior management, so that shortcuts and poor safety behaviour are not tolerated. Everyone should be adequately trained, informed, supervised and resourced, so they work safely and report any concerns or incidents for investigation.

HR needs to actively engage workers in helping keep workplaces safe, and should regularly consult them on health and safety arrangements.

While winning ‘hearts and minds’ is imperative, deliberate or reckless acts that endanger people must be dealt with through the disciplinary process. Directors and senior managers need to fully understand their health and safety responsibilities and should have access to competent health and safety assistance.

Health and safety should affect all business decisions, including the use of procurement standards to ensure it isn’t compromised when purchasing goods, equipment or services.

Organisations convicted of the new offence can expect hefty fines and possible remedial orders and, as a result of adverse publicity and reputational damage, may lose business, as well as public, employee, investor and insurer confidence.

Main elements of the new act

  • A focus on gross failures by organisations and the removal of the need to identify a “controlling mind”, which previously prevented large organisations being successfully prosecuted.
  • The failures concerned will involve the way in which senior managers organise or manage the organisation’s activities, falling far below what could reasonably be expected in the circumstances.
  • Companies and other corporate bodies, such as local government and central government departments, will be covered by the Act.
  • Penalties will include fines and remedial orders.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

By Richard Jones, director of technical affairs, Institution of Occupational Safety and Health


 

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Staff want pensions presentations to be easier to understand
next post
Northern Ireland: Is there still a big divide between Protestant and Catholic workers?

You may also like

Employers’ duty of care: keeping workers safe in...

27 Jun 2025

When will the Employment Rights Bill become law?

26 Jun 2025

Seven ways to prepare now for the Employment...

20 Jun 2025

The employer strikes back: the rise of ‘quiet...

13 Jun 2025

Lawyers warn over impact of Employment Rights Bill...

13 Jun 2025

Racism claims have tripled and ‘Equality Act is...

12 Jun 2025

Court rejects Liberty’s legal challenge against EHRC consultation

9 Jun 2025

US Supreme Court lowers burden of proof for...

6 Jun 2025

Institute of Directors demand reforms to Employment Rights...

6 Jun 2025

Employment Rights Bill: peers propose change to work...

4 Jun 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+