Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Belief discrimination

Political beliefs

by Personnel Today 20 Jan 2004
by Personnel Today 20 Jan 2004


Q The Home Secretary has called for the police to automatically disqualify members of the British National Party from becoming police officers. Will this affect other employers?

A This is clearly an issue which will be discussed at Home Office level between the relevant stakeholders, such as the Police Federation and the Association of Chief Police Officers.

Police officers are not strictly staff in the traditional sense of the word. Their terms and conditions of service are governed by specific regulations outlined in statute. But there may well be human rights issues that arise if this proposal is implemented.

Looking at the more common scenario, it is rare for an employer to specify in a contract of employment or staff handbook that staff cannot be members of certain political parties. In any workforce, there will be a variety of political perspectives. Many employees are involved, during their non-work time, in political organisations or in a representative role.

Usually, it is the case that as long as a worker is not engaged in political activities during the company’s time (without express permission), then the issue never comes to light. But this could change if such affiliations brought discredit or adverse publicity for the employer. Such situations would have to be reviewed on a case-by-case basis.

Q What if those views are expressed in the workplace?

A Under the provisions of the Human Rights Act, the right to privacy is one of the key rights afforded to individuals. The right to privacy has a number of facets, including the right of privacy of personal behaviour, sexual preference and political activity.

However, the right in relation to political activity (in its broadest sense) is somewhat counterbalanced by discrimination legislation. The ambit of discrimination legislation has been broadened by recent legislative developments that provide protection for gay/lesbian staff and those who hold certain religious or philosophical beliefs.

It is not for an employer to make value judgements about workers’ political activities or views. However, an employer may want to remind staff that the privacy and dignity of all individuals in a workplace must be respected.

The general tenor of the new equality regulations is that staff who are gay/lesbian or hold certain religious and or philosophical beliefs shouldn’t be discriminated against because of their orientation/beliefs. Under established legislation, if offensive comments were made to a worker on the grounds of gender, race or disability, it could also amount to harassment.

Q What should an employer do?

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

A The person making comments should be reminded that although they have a right to have certain political views, people who may not hold those political views or may be offended by them should also be respected. If such behaviour continues, disciplinary action may have to be taken.

Such situations must be dealt with sensitively on a case-by-case basis. Should an employer be facing a dismissal situation, it would be imperative that the reason for dismissal was not made on the grounds of political association, but because the behaviour was so aggressive or demeaning that it amounted to misconduct.

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Higgs: One Year On
next post
Department for Work and Pensions v Matthew Thompson, EAT [23 October 2003]

You may also like

Barts nurse told to remove watermelon image claims...

19 Jun 2025

Darlington nurses’ changing room case delayed to October

3 Apr 2025

University of Sussex attacks Kathleen Stock freedom of...

27 Mar 2025

DSTL scientist constructively dismissed for gender-critical views

24 Mar 2025

EDI should not stifle LGB rights in the...

4 Mar 2025

Higgs’ victory has ‘profound’ implications for employers

12 Feb 2025

LGB Alliance launches Business Forum to ‘restore’ gay...

5 Feb 2025

Employment Rights Bill: EHRC warns MPs of ‘cumulative’...

14 Jan 2025

Darlington nurses gain Conservative support over single-sex spaces

3 Dec 2024

Rape crisis worker dismissed over gender-critical views awarded...

7 Nov 2024

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+