Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Employee relationsIndustrial action / strikes

Unite takes British Airways to High Court over cabin crew cuts

by Kat Baker 2 Feb 2010
by Kat Baker 2 Feb 2010

The Unite union has taken British Airways (BA) to the High Court in an attempt to secure an injunction against the airline’s cuts to the number of crew on flights.


In November, BA imposed the changes which cut the number of cabin crew by the equivalent of 1,700 full-time jobs in a bid to save £140m a year in cabin crew costs. But Unite has claimed it was not consulted properly about the cuts, and hopes to bring a halt to the money-saving initiative through a permanent injunction.


Unite initially took BA to court on 5 November to seek an interim injunction to prevent the airline from introducing the changes, but the application was refused. The judge did however order a trial to investigate the alleged breach of contract by BA in imposing the reductions, which is now being heard in the High Court.


BA has said it is entitled to reduce cabin crew numbers on board its flights as these are not terms of individual cabin crew members’ contracts.


But Unite said BA was in breach of contract by imposing the changes because the existing crew levels were fixed by collective agreements with the unions and were “expressly incorporated” into individual contracts.


The five-day long court action will investigate 10 test cases representative of about 5,400 claimants who were among the 13,400 cabin crew employed by BA.


John Hendy, acting on behalf of Unite, told the High Court judge: “The question before you is whether BA was contractually entitled to reduce crewing levels unilaterally or whether they needed agreement before doing so.


“BA’s case is that collective agreements are incorporated into the contracts of employment, but the principal defence is that the term which specifies the number of crew is somehow inapt for incorporation.


“We say on behalf of the cabin crew that the number of workers allocated to a job is no more inapt for incorporation than hours of work or rates of pay.”


A BA spokeswoman said: “A High Court hearing, initiated by Unite, begins today to examine the issue of whether onboard crew levels form part of the individual contracts of cabin crew. We have always said we believe they do not.”


Philip Henson, head of employment law at City law firm Bargate Murray, added Unite was using its latest High Court challenge to restore its reputation following BA’s successful injunction against its strike ballot in December.


He said: “The public declaration by the High Court in December last year that Unite breached statutory balloting requirements would no doubt have bruised the ego of the union; and many are viewing this trial as a means of fighting to restore its credibility, which may have been diminished with its members.”


Unite is currently 12,000 cabin crew for strike action, with the result of this ballot due on 22 February.

Avatar
Kat Baker

previous post
Smoking ban extension will include workplace entrances
next post
Flexible working extension to right to request unlikely in near future

You may also like

Who is on strike and when?

5 Jun 2023

University staff in further strikes over pay docking

2 Jun 2023

Employers face three days of disruption as train...

31 May 2023

Strikes: Documentary gains access inside the unions

25 May 2023

Coca-Cola workers to strike at UK soft drinks...

25 May 2023

Royal Mail dispute: postal union pauses vote on...

25 May 2023

Junior doctors to strike across England in June

23 May 2023

MPs vote down strikes bill amendments

23 May 2023

Teachers’ pay review body recommends 6.5% pay increase

22 May 2023

First female chief conciliator for Acas

19 May 2023

  • The HR Bundle: Your one-stop guide to building a successful global HR Department PROMOTED | Get your hands on Deel’s free HR bundle...Read more
  • The Benefits of an Employee Assistance Programme PROMOTED | EAPs support employees in a range of ways...Read more
  • Intergenerational working and how to manage up and down the generations PROMOTED | The benefits and challenges of intergenerational workplaces...Read more
  • Bereavement in the workplace: How training can help HR get it right PROMOTED | HR professionals play an essential role...Read more
  • UK workforce mental wellbeing needs PROMOTED | The mental wellbeing support employers are providing misses the mark...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2023

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2023 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+