If you have ginger hair or a regional accent, society believes it is perfectly acceptable to tease you about it. And with increased focus on the importance of physical attractiveness, many in HR believe workplaces are becoming 'lookist'.
These are the findings from our 'ugliness' survey, carried out last month among nearly 4,000 readers of Personnel Today. Inspired by Channel 4's Ugly Betty - about the trials of an ugly duckling among the swans of a glamorous New York fashion magazine - we sought to discover how 'difference' is viewed and treated in the workplace and society at large.
We asked: To what extent do you agree or disagree that society believes it is acceptable to tease people about certain hair, facial or bodily characteristics? Ginger hair is by far and away the feature that the majority (81%) believe is permissible to joke about. While only 20% say they personally think it's acceptable to mock their red-haired colleagues, 79% of those survey respondents who have ginger hair have been teased because of it.
Blondes also get more stick than most. Three-quarters of respondents think society believes it is OK to poke fun at blondes, but only half of the fair-haired people surveyed have personally been teased about it.
Baldness is another easy target, with 84% having the mickey taken out of them, and 72% believing that it is acceptable to do so in the eyes of society.
The way you speak is also considered an easy target. Three-quarters believe society thinks it is OK to rib you for your regional accent, though only one in five says that they would personally banter about this. A high percentage (87%) say their accent has been the butt of the joke, as do 91% of those with a speech impediment. This is surprising, given that 97% of respondents say that, personally, they would never tease someone with a speech impediment. Acne and dandruff are two other no-go areas.
Generally, if the physical characteristic is a result of a medical condition, then it is not safe to tease about it. But if it is something you have chosen yourself (for example, an unconventional outfit), then society deems you fair game, according to our figures.
Interestingly, more people have been laughed at for being underweight (84%) than overweight (63%) short people receive more jibes than their tall counterparts (74% versus 45%) and women with large breasts (73%) receive more comments than those with small breasts (59%).
Gender differences
Men and women have very different attitudes towards what is acceptable. Seventy per cent of men admit they have teased people about the way they look, compared with just 52% of women. Men, on average, are twice as likely to tease someone about an individual characteristic than a woman is. For example, one-third of the men who took part in our survey personally think it is acceptable to joke about the clothes someone is wearing, compared with just 16% of women and 18% of men would tease someone for being fat, compared with just 5% of women.
Maria Yapp, chief executive of Xancam, a firm of business psychologists, says men emerge as less sensitive to other people's opinions, and what people say generally won't affect their opinion of themselves.
Yapp adds: "Women tend to be 'field dependent' - they rely more on other people's views of them. Women tend to be less likely to tease because they are more socially sensitive and think: 'how would I feel if that happened to me?'"
Political correctness gone mad
So when is it acceptable to tease? Generally, it is permissible when both parties know each other, take it in the spirit it was intended, and everyone is laughing - but not when it makes anyone uncomfortable or hurt, or when comments are made to someone you don't know.
"Context and audience are all-important. You should be able to know what the reaction is likely to be before you tease - otherwise don't do it," says one respondent.
However, many of you agree that there is a fine line between good-natured teasing and spiteful bullying. But while being mindful of political correctness, HR departments are generally loath to insert 'no-teasing' clauses into employees' terms and conditions. Not least because it would be impossible to police - and anyway, who wants to work in a sterile, po-faced environment?
Here's a selection of your views:
A culture of 'lookism'
There is a thread running through many of your responses, and that is the belief that good-looking people get ahead more quickly, easily and gainfully than those who are 'different'. In other words, a culture of 'lookism' has emerged in the workplace. Some of you blame the media, particularly the rise of celebrity magazines that prize beauty and conformity, and ridicule any deviation from the 'ideal'.
What HR has to deal with is a bunch of line managers who recruit on this basis - either consciously or sub-consciously - as your verbatim comments reveal:
Finally, here is a snapshot of the kind of teasing that you have to put up with:
Blonde hair:
Regional accents:
Ginger hair:
Weight:
Dress sense:
Breast size:
Height:
The employment lawyer's perspective
"There is currently no law that prevents discrimination on the grounds of hair colour or size of nose, but some aspects of teasing could be covered by current legislation. For example, teasing about a person's age could amount to harassment under the age regulations, and teasing a blonde woman for being dense - or commenting on breast size - could be sexual harassment.
Where teasing becomes bullying, employers could face claims of constructive dismissal if they didn't stop it or prevent the employee from being harassed.
Green v DB Group Services (UK) Ltd is an example of a case that went beyond teasing in the office. The employee had a nervous breakdown because of bullying from her workmates - and she received £800,000 compensation.
The challenge for HR is in maintaining a non-sterile working atmosphere, while preserving people's sense of dignity. Diversity policies should stipulate that it is unacceptable to make unwanted comments about people's features. The real difficulty is in defining what is and isn't unwanted - and that's a real minefield. What's consensual on one day may not be acceptable on another."
Alan Chalmers, employment partner, DLA Piper
The business psychologist's perspective
"Everyone creates their own reality. When you squeeze an orange, what comes out is what's inside - ie, orange juice. If someone makes a malicious taunt, it shows that they don't feel great inside.
How you react reflects what you feel you're worth. So if you react badly, it shows you don't feel great, either. Sometimes recipients of teasing don't take it well because they're coming at it from a victim mentality, and because inside they don't feel good about themselves.
Next time you react badly, stop and ask yourself what that is saying about what's inside you.
You can't change what other people do - you have no control over that - but you can fix your own reaction. And that starts with your own self worth.
By creating a strong internal reference point, you won't take to heart what people say. You'll be less dependent on how you look to others, and more stress-resistant as a result."
Maria Yapp, chief executive, Xancam (business psychologists)
Survey results
I wholeheartedly agree with Ian. As I have commented previously the modern workplace is lacking in moral/spiritual awareness already and has the wrong values without making it worse.
I can't see how the way a peson reacts to being bullied has much to do with them. Over time even the strongest person will eventually be worn down especially in no-win situation where the person is your boss, the attacks are subtle but very real and in the end there is nothing you can do but get out. It is not as simple as feeling strong inside - being bullied is a very real threat. It is the subtlety that is the problem, it makes it hard to challenge it without looking paranoid and that is the problem. People put up with it for so long they eventually experience a stress breakdown - only a true sociopath or psychopath could cope with being bullied, simply because they are unable to feel anxiety/guilt. In other words only those who can feel the emotions that make us human are worn down eventually by bullying. Doesn't matter how strong you are. Believe me I put up with it for 18 months before I realised I couldn't take it anymore. True it is about feeling confidence but really it is thebully with the social and personal problems, not the target. What the bully is doing is literally forcing their issues onto a healthy target. The target would not be a target if they weren't so healthy and competent to begin with. Targets are not weak - we are usually the strongest most competent and socially skilled individuals. That indeed is why we become targets! Aint nothin wrong with me honey! I have no more or less insecurity than the next person - difference is I do not project it onto other people to make myself feel better...
In a sense this preocupation with appearance/look etc dovetails with organisations' preoccupations with image. Companies have a look and are all too afraid about not getting it 'right', in some cases to the point of paranoia. A fear of stigmatisation for being who/what it really is. Why not invent a 'false' image so as to become more 'competitive'. Thus legitimising deception/self deception as part of the competitive package. The pay off in terms of values,ethical behaviour, staff morale {medium/long term}, and trust represents a potentially darker side of the balance sheet.
| Alert me when new articles are added which relate to these topics | |
Bullying and harassment | |
| Alert me when new articles are added which relate to these specialism areas | |
General HR management | |