Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Equality, diversity and inclusionEqual pay

Male workers win landmark equal pay case

by John Charlton 25 Jun 2009
by John Charlton 25 Jun 2009

Thousands of male claimants pursuing equal pay claims will be able to take them forward following a ruling yesterday by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT).


The EAT ruled in the case of Abbott and Others v South Tyneside Council that male claimants can “piggy back” on successful claims for equal pay brought by female claimants doing similar jobs. The men worked in jobs such as care assistants, caretakers, drivers and leisure centre attendants, and had lodged claims about discriminatory bonuses paid to male workers in better-paid jobs, such as gardeners and refuse collectors.


The claims were lodged at the same time as similar ones made by female workers between 2003 and 2005 in cases including Anderson v South TynesideDolphin v Hartlepool and Surtees v Middlesbrough. Although the women claimants eventually won their cases, a compromise deal reached in 2006 to cover the South Tyneside male claimants was withdrawn by the council.


They claimed the council’s action was discriminatory â€“ a claim that the employment tribunal judge at the time, Judge Hargrove, said was “well-founded”.


The council appealed, but the EAT ruled that the 300 men in the case should have been offered the same pay as the women.


Presiding judge, Mr Justice Underhill, said: “It would be surprising and unsatisfactory if the Equal Pay Act offered no remedy to men in a situation like the present. The case where men and women do the same job but receive different rates of pay is the paradigm of the kind of situation which the Act was intended to prevent: how would it seem if â€“ unusually but not impossibly â€“ the roles were reversed and the ‘piggyback’ claimants were not men but women?”


Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Barrister and equal pay specialist Yvette Genn, of law firm Cloisters, said: “This is an important decision as it means that equal pay laws  can be applied not only by women who compare themselves with men, but also by men who  have jobs that are predominately done by women, and who therefore compare themselves with better paid men.”


Even though women historically have received lower pay than their male counterparts, it is too often forgotten that the law applies equally to men as it does to women. This ruling is what thousands of male workers who have not received equal pay up and down the country have been waiting for. There is no doubt that many of the similar 12,000 cases in the system will now proceed and are likely to be successful.”

John Charlton

previous post
Rail engineers to strike over job cuts threat
next post
Workplace deaths figure may be skewed by drop in workload and jobs

You may also like

Why fighting the DEI backlash is about PR...

9 May 2025

Rethinking talent: Who was never considered in the...

7 May 2025

Reform UK councils’ staff face WFH ban

6 May 2025

Lincolnshire doctor awarded £250k in race discrimination case

2 May 2025

‘Unacceptable to question integrity’ of Supreme Court judgment

2 May 2025

Connect to Work: how businesses can play their...

2 May 2025

Supreme Court ruling and EHRC latest: how should...

28 Apr 2025

EHRC: Interim update on single-sex spaces draws criticism

28 Apr 2025

Opposition to Supreme Court sex ruling is ‘wishful...

22 Apr 2025

Supreme Court transgender ruling: ‘common sense’ or ‘incredibly...

17 Apr 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+