Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Associative discriminationEmployment lawEquality, diversity and inclusionDisability

Coleman tribunal ruling extends ‘associative discrimination’ rights to private sector

by Kat Baker 30 Oct 2009
by Kat Baker 30 Oct 2009

Private sector carers will now be afforded the same rights as those in the public sector following a landmark employment tribunal ruling today.

The ruling Coleman v Attridge Law will enable private sector carers to make a claim under the Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) for discrimination against them on account of their caring duties for a disabled person.

Under an EU Directive, only public sector carers previously had this right.

The ruling found: “The DDA can be interpreted so as to apply to ‘associative’ discrimination.”

But Rachel Dineley, employment partner at law firm Beachcroft, told Personnel Today the ruling could now be applied to all strands of discrimination legislation.

She said: “Employers must ensure they don’t consciously and inadvertently treat people less favourably as a result of their association with someone who has a protected characteristic.”

Jo Stubbs, XpertHR employment law editor, added while recent legislation on sexual orientation and religion and belief regulations had included associative discrimination, this was not the case for age regulations.

She said: “There is now potential for an individual to claim that they were directly discriminated against or harassed on grounds of, for example, the age of their spouse or partner.”

Sharon Coleman took her employer, Attridge Law, to an employment tribunal in 2005 claiming constructive dismissal and disability discrimination after she felt the company had unlawfully discriminated against her because of her caring duties for her disabled son.

The case was referred to the European Court of Justice in 2007, which ruled in July that the EU’s anti-discrimination laws also covered disabled people’s carers. Public sector workers with caring duties were able to rely on the EU directive immediately but private sector workers were not covered.

In November 2008, an employment tribunal ruled that the DDA could provide protection for carers, but Attridge Law appealed the decision earlier this year.

Today, Justice Underhill, the president of the Employment Appeal Tribunal, dismissed the appeal, affording all private sector carers protection from disability discrimination.

Dineley said the ruling would have most bearing on formal and informal flexible working requests, but added it was not just restricted to carers.

She said the ruling would provide protection for anyone with “an association” to someone with a protected characteristic, until the Equality Bill comes into effect next year.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Clause 13 of the Equality Bill will provide specific protection for those associated with people with protected characteristics.

Coleman’s case will now return to an employment tribunal.

Kat Baker

previous post
Friday Podcast: Fewer apprenticeships for under-25s; TUPE and insolvencies
next post
Gender pay gap ‘cheque’ given to Gordon Brown by equality campaigners

You may also like

Fewer workers would comply with a return-to-office mandate

21 May 2025

Redefining leadership: From competence to inclusion

21 May 2025

Consultation launched after Supreme Court ‘sex’ ruling

20 May 2025

Minister defends Employment Rights Bill at Acas conference

16 May 2025

CBI chair Soames accuses ministers of not listening...

16 May 2025

EHRC bows to pressure and extends gender consultation

15 May 2025

Culture, ‘micro-incivilities’ and invisible talent

14 May 2025

Contract cleaner loses EAT race discrimination appeal

14 May 2025

Why fighting the DEI backlash is about PR...

9 May 2025

So what does the election of a new...

9 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+