Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Case law

Assessing compensation for hurt feelings

by Personnel Today 25 Jul 2000
by Personnel Today 25 Jul 2000

ICTS (UK) v Tchoula IRLB 644 EAT

• Tchoula’s race discrimination claim listed more than 20 complaints against ICTS, and following his dismissal he added a number of victimisation complaints. All but three of the complaints were dismissed. Tchoula was awarded more than £50,000, which included £22,000 for injury to feelings and £5,000 aggravated damages.

On appeal, the EAT held the award for injury to feelings was “manifestly excessive” and wrong in law. Such awards should be compensatory, not punitive, and should be broadly in line with personal injury awards. Injuries which resulted in awards of £27,000 included moderate brain damage and psychiatric injury.

The EAT put previously decided cases into “higher category” cases with awards ranging between £20-£30,000, and “lower category” cases ranging between £6,500 and £13,500. Tchoula’s was a “lower category” case; only three of his claims were successful, the victimisation took place over 10 days, and he suffered no depression from his treatment by ICTS. The EAT substituted £7,500 for injury to feelings and £2,500 for aggravated damages.


Ultimatum was discriminatory


Stringer v First Leisure Corporation EOR Discrimination Digest 44, ET

• Stringer worked as a deputy manager at a night club in Hull, commuting regularly from Loughborough where she lived with her husband who also worked for First Leisure.

In March 1999, her senior manager threatened and bullied her and told Stringer she had to show greater commitment to First Leisure by moving to Hull and choosing between her job or her marriage. Stringer went on sick leave and her medical certificates indicated she suffered from depression for two-and-a-half months. She subsequently resigned and brought a sex discrimination claim.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The tribunal held that she lost her job because she was a married woman. The ultimatum had meant choosing between living with her husband or working in Hull. She was less favourably treated because of her sex because no such ultimatum had been given to her husband.

The tribunal awarded Stringer almost £29,000. This included £2,000 for the depression she had experienced, and £20,000 for injury to feelings which took into account her age, status and ambitions.

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
A new dawn for union deals?
next post
Stress – the emerging risk

You may also like

EHRC bows to pressure and extends gender consultation

15 May 2025

‘Unacceptable to question integrity’ of Supreme Court judgment

2 May 2025

Trans ex-judge to appeal Supreme Court biological sex...

29 Apr 2025

EHRC: Interim update on single-sex spaces draws criticism

28 Apr 2025

Opposition to Supreme Court sex ruling is ‘wishful...

22 Apr 2025

Supreme Court transgender ruling: ‘common sense’ or ‘incredibly...

17 Apr 2025

Supreme Court: legal definition of woman based on...

16 Apr 2025

Philip Green loses human rights case at ECHR

8 Apr 2025

Whistleblowing protections do not extend to external job...

4 Apr 2025

Court of Appeal hears Ryanair pilot’s worker status...

1 Apr 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+