Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Age discriminationTribunal WatchConstructive dismissalPregnancy and maternity discriminationRetirement

Tribunal watch: Cricket umpires lose age discrimination case

by Stephen Simpson 16 Mar 2015
by Stephen Simpson 16 Mar 2015 Peter Willey, pictured in 2000, and fellow umpire George Sharp lost their ageism case. Photo: Robert Hallam/REX
Peter Willey, pictured in 2000, and fellow umpire George Sharp lost their ageism case. Photo: Robert Hallam/REX

An employment tribunal has rejected the age discrimination claims brought by two former cricket umpires, who were removed from their posts after reaching an “expected retirement age”. Stephen Simpson rounds up employment tribunal decisions reported in the past week.

Peter Willey and George Sharp lose age discrimination case
Cricket umpires Peter Willey and George Sharp have lost their age discrimination case against the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB), reports the BBC.

The claimants were removed from the first-class umpire list when they reached the ECB’s “expected retirement age” of 65.

Discrimination in sport

Football officials suffered age discrimination

Football club’s dismissal of player for making racism allegations was victimisation

What is the employment status of football referees?

Their union, Prospect, was disappointed by the judgment. It explained that the tribunal accepted that the pair had been treated less favourably because of their age, but concluded that the treatment was justified because the ECB wanted to ensure opportunities for succession planning and appointing new umpires.

The ECB had also argued that the decision was justified because it wanted to maintain dignity by not having to dismiss umpires because of a decline in performance at some point in the future. However, the tribunal did not accept that this reason would have justified the umpire’s retirement.

Other tribunal decisions in the headlines

David Cameron steps in after NHS whistleblower is pursued for £100,000 in costs after losing her case on a legal technicality
David Cameron has asked Jeremy Hunt, the Secretary of State for Health, to investigate why a whistleblower at one of the country’s largest mental health trusts is being pursued for almost £100,000 in costs after losing her case on a legal technicality, according to the Independent.

Unfairly dismissed headteacher awarded almost £90,000
A long-serving headteacher who was unfairly dismissed from her job at All Saints Primary School, after clashing with governors, has been awarded the maximum compensation by a tribunal, reports the Midweek Herald.

TUC ordered to compensate Merseyside mum “forced from job” after having third child
A mum of three won compensation after being “forced out” of her job at Britain’s trade union federation when she returned from maternity leave, reports the Liverpool Echo.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Tribunal rules for Wrexham Council employee over increase in work
An employment tribunal judge has ruled in favour of a woman who felt forced to resign after Wrexham Council increased her workload, according to the North Wales News. The local authority has been ordered to pay more than £8,000 in compensation and fees.

Dudley teacher could face a big bill after losing employment tribunal
A Dudley teacher may have to cough up a “substantial amount” of cash after losing an employment tribunal, says the Evesham Journal.

Stephen Simpson

Stephen Simpson is Principal HR Strategy and Practice Editor at Brightmine. His areas of responsibility include the policies and documents and law reports. After obtaining a law degree and training to be a solicitor, he moved into publishing, initially with Butterworths. He joined Brightmine in its early days in 2001.

previous post
Zero hours contracts: exclusivity clause ban moves a step closer
next post
Government announces fund to help young adults with special educational needs

You may also like

Lidl enters agreement with EHRC to prevent sexual...

22 Aug 2025

Nature charity unfairly dismisses employee in ‘woeful’ process

22 Aug 2025

Security manager at BBC unfairly dismissed after ‘misusing’...

21 Aug 2025

Reasonable adjustment failures for epilepsy lead to £445k...

21 Aug 2025

‘Noisy and boisterous’ younger colleagues not age-related harassment

20 Aug 2025

‘Zero tolerance’ on staff discount abuse leads to...

19 Aug 2025

Security officer who showed ‘racist’ video wins £44k...

18 Aug 2025

BA crew member too anxious to fly wins...

13 Aug 2025

RAF sergeant’s maternity discrimination claim upheld at EAT

13 Aug 2025

Raise retirement in line with life expectancy, say...

11 Aug 2025

  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise