Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Latest News

Manufacturers call for clarity over pensions protection fund

by Personnel Today 13 Jul 2004
by Personnel Today 13 Jul 2004

Government
policy on the proposed Pension Protection Fund (PPF) is currently poorly
expressed and needs greater clarity if it is to have any chance of greater
employer support according to the latest EEF/Aon Consulting survey.

This
call was made following publication of results from the survey, which analysed
the views on the PPF of just under 50 of the UK’s largest manufacturing
companies with occupational pension schemes.

Despite
a high level of support in principle for the idea of the PPF, the survey showed
that, as it is currently designed, there is still considerable confusion and
uncertainty among employers about how the PPF will operate and the costs that
they will incur. Until these are resolved, it is clear that it will be
difficult for employers to give greater support to the PPF.

Key
findings from the survey:

•
Two-thirds of the companies supported, in principle, the idea of the PPF

•
Three-quarters felt that employers should be able to recover all or part of the
PPF levy from pension scheme members

•
Nearly 85 per cent of the companies who responded felt that the introduction of
the PPF would have a negative or no impact on their decision to provide a
defined benefit occupational pension scheme in the future.

Commenting
on the findings, David Yeandle, deputy director of employment policy at the EEF
manufacturers organisation, said: "Employers clearly need more information
about the way in which the PPF will operate to make a proper assessment of its
practical implications for their business. Time is rapidly running out if this
is to be done before the PPF’s planned implementation in April 2005.

"These
results also reinforce the EEF’s view that there is very little in the Pensions
Bill encouraging employers to introduce new, or enhance existing, occupational
pension arrangements," Yeandle added.

Donald
Duval, head of professional practice at Aon Consulting said: "It is a
terrible thing to lose your pension savings because your company has gone
broke, and something needs to be done about it. Fortunately it is a relatively
rare event, and the majority of the UK public will receive their pension
savings on retirement. Yet for too many, this will still not prove enough to
provide a decent pension – because not enough is being saved.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

"The
Government must not lose sight of this bigger issue – the savings shortfall. It
is vital that it continues to promote a better understanding of saving for
retirement and encourage greater pension provision now more than ever
before."

By Quentin Reade

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Testing times for drink or drug abuse
next post
Sex discrimination settlement costs Morgan Stanley £29m

You may also like

Connect to Work scheme to benefit 15 areas...

4 Sep 2025

Sandie Peggie launches fresh legal action against NHS...

3 Sep 2025

How to stop flying blind with workforce planning

3 Sep 2025

Ex-Specsavers director suspended over wrongful expense claims of...

3 Sep 2025

Salesforce cuts 4,000 customer service roles as AI...

3 Sep 2025

New ‘failure to prevent fraud’ law a ‘game-changer’

2 Sep 2025

PCs removed from firearms unit after Tallia Storm...

2 Sep 2025

Top 10 HR questions August 2025: Conduct outside...

2 Sep 2025

Nestlé sacks CEO over ‘undisclosed’ romantic affair

2 Sep 2025

Revolut employees to receive share sale payout

2 Sep 2025

  • Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain with centred ergonomics SPONSORED | If you often notice...Read more
  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise