Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employment lawEmployment tribunals

Taylor v XLN Telecom and others, EAT

by Personnel Today 11 May 2010
by Personnel Today 11 May 2010

The claimant, Mr Taylor, succeeded in his claim against his former employer for unlawful victimisation under the Race Relations Act 1976.


The employment tribunal (ET) decided not to award him compensation for injury to feelings, relying on earlier case law which held that an award in respect of injury to feelings had to result from knowledge that it was an act of discrimination which brought about a dismissal.


The ET found the claimant had been dismissed partly on perceived performance grounds and partly because he had brought a grievance and made an allegation of racial discrimination when doing so. The ET found the claimant had attributed any injured feelings, not to his knowledge of any act of victimisation, but to the employer’s failure to comply with the statutory grievance and disciplinary procedures.


The claimant’s appeal was allowed. The case law that the ET referred to was specifically concerned with an award for injury to feelings and had no application to a claim for injury to health (the claimant was diagnosed with depression, an injury to health). The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) noted there was a conceptual distinction between the two types of injury, but the rules of recoverable compensation in relation to each should not be different in the circumstances, particularly where there is a degree of overlap in the actual suffering/injury for which any employee may claim. There was no reason in principle for making an exception in the case of awards for injury to feelings in discrimination cases.


The EAT therefore held that, in principle, an injury to health such as depression was governed by the usual principles applying to personal injury compensation, in other words that a claimant recovers compensation for the damage caused to him by a wrongful act. The claimant should therefore be able to recover compensation for his depression, irrespective of what he knew or did not know about his former employer’s motivation in dismissing him.


Key points


An employee complaining of discrimination could recover compensation for injury to feelings as long as the injury was attributable to the discriminatory conduct – it is not necessary that the employee should know of, or even suspect, the employer’s discriminatory motivation.


Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Different rules should not govern the recoverability of compensation for injury to feelings and injury to health (personal injury).

 

Personnel Today

previous post
Regional view: Liverpool
next post
Hung parliament and economic uncertainty stall employer expansion plans

You may also like

Government publishes ‘roadmap’ for Employment Rights Bill

1 Jul 2025

Employers’ duty of care: keeping workers safe in...

27 Jun 2025

When will the Employment Rights Bill become law?

26 Jun 2025

HR manager with ‘messy’ work loses discrimination case

25 Jun 2025

Man who used company credit card for himself...

23 Jun 2025

Seven ways to prepare now for the Employment...

20 Jun 2025

AI company did not racially discriminate against Chinese...

20 Jun 2025

Barts nurse told to remove watermelon image claims...

19 Jun 2025

WFH employee who falsified timesheets loses unfair dismissal...

16 Jun 2025

Sleeping security officer wins £20k for unfair dismissal

16 Jun 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+