Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Latest News

MSF to shame firms which shirk from equal pay audits

by Personnel Today 2 Jan 2002
by Personnel Today 2 Jan 2002

The MSF union is pushing for
equality of  pay for women in 2002 by
demanding equal pay audits from employers.

The union has sent out letters
to 10,000 employers demanding that they carry out an equal pay audit. The names
of companies that refuse to carry out an audit will be published in a "list
of shame" in the New Year.

The union aims to survey every UK
company in the sectors it covers by the end of 2002. Two lists will be
published: an A-list of all those companies who agree to undertake audits and a
B-list of those who refuse or fail to reply.

The insurance giant Legal and
General has already agreed to carry out an equal pay audit of its 6,000 staff.

The union’s action follows
recommendations made in the Kingsmill report (5 December 2001) which revealed
an increase in the pay gap between men and women from 18 per cent to 19 per
cent and urged employers to carry out audits voluntarily.

The MSF has been campaigning
for the audits to be made mandatory in the face of opposition from the CBI and
Institute of Directors.

"We expect that most of
the companies we do business with will be happy to carry out voluntary audits.
However, bad employers who discriminate against women will refuse, and
thousands of women will continue to be cheated out of money they are entitled
to. Mandatory pay audits are the only way to equal pay," said MSF equalities
officer Gail Cartmail.

MSF General Secretary Roger
Lyons said, "It is a disgrace that 31 years after the Equal Pay Act the
pay gap between men and women in the UK is increasing.

"If the CBI and the IOD
seriously believe there is no pay discrimination against women they should be
encouraging their members to audit and put an end to the pay gap.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

"We hope that through our
campaign we can bring hope to millions of women who face discrimination at work
and expose those bad employers who oppose Equal Pay Audits."

By Ben Willmott

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Modern-minded MDs lighten up their business talk
next post
Employers need to help staff balance work and life

You may also like

MoD worker loses harassment claim over lack of...

27 Aug 2025

Acas to explore use of AI as half...

27 Aug 2025

TUC calls for ‘step change’ as half worry...

27 Aug 2025

Poundland avoids collapse as restructure approved

27 Aug 2025

London hotel housekeepers call off strike action

27 Aug 2025

Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain...

27 Aug 2025

Café worker awarded £22k after being too cold...

26 Aug 2025

Royal Mail eCourier drivers bring legal claim over...

26 Aug 2025

Data bias means gender pay gap wider than...

26 Aug 2025

Jobs market continued to struggle during July

26 Aug 2025

  • Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain with centred ergonomics SPONSORED | If you often notice...Read more
  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise