Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employment lawRedundancy

Case round-up: Shanahan Engineering v Unite the Union, EAT

by Personnel Today 29 Apr 2010
by Personnel Today 29 Apr 2010

Shanahan, an engineering construction contractor, employed more than 145 people on a site, constructing two generators. The short-term work meant that a number of redundancies were expected. Shanahan and Unite agreed a selection process in advance. For health and safety reasons Shanahan’s client, Alstom, instructed Shanahan to drastically change the nature of the work at short notice. Shanahan had to make 50 redundancies quickly.

Collective consultation

Section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (TULRCA) requires employers to consult collectively (with unions or elected representatives) where 20 or more redundancies are proposed within a 90-day period. Consultation should start at least 30 days before the first dismissal takes effect.

There is an exception for special circumstances” which make it not reasonably practicable to carry out the normal 30-day consultation. Shanahan made 50 redundancies without carrying out any consultation. Unite brought a claim on behalf of employees that Shanahan had failed to comply with section 188 TULRCA. The tribunal decided Shanahan had breached its duty to consult. Even though the “special circumstances” defence applied, Shanahan should have carried out however much consultation was possible in the time available. The tribunal awarded maximum 90-day protective awards in relation to the employees.

Shanahan appealed. The EAT said because special circumstances existed which affected the timing of the consultation, the obligation to consult still remained. The EAT upheld the tribunal’s decision that Shanahan had failed to consult but remitted the case for the tribunal to reconsider the level of the protective award.

The special circumstances were an important factor that should have been weighed when deciding the award.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Key points

  • Even where the “special circumstances” defence applies to absolve an employer from completing a full consultation process, the obligation to inform and consult, even in a short period, may still remain.
  • The special circumstances defence will only arise in narrow circumstances.
  • The protective award is not compensatory but is a penal award to provide a sanction for the employer’s breach. The tribunal should consider all circumstances, and make an award that is just and equitable.

What you should do

  • Always consider whether collective information and consultation requirements apply when making redundancies. When redundancies need to be made quickly due to special circumstances, conduct whatever consultation you can.

Personnel Today

previous post
RAF awarded for encouraging school girls to consider engineering careers
next post
PearceMayfield is number one in change management

You may also like

Government publishes ‘roadmap’ for Employment Rights Bill

1 Jul 2025

Employers’ duty of care: keeping workers safe in...

27 Jun 2025

Bioethanol plant closure could lead to 4,000 job...

26 Jun 2025

When will the Employment Rights Bill become law?

26 Jun 2025

Graduate jobs this summer ‘will be toughest since...

25 Jun 2025

Seven ways to prepare now for the Employment...

20 Jun 2025

Allianz to cut 650 jobs in the UK

19 Jun 2025

The employer strikes back: the rise of ‘quiet...

13 Jun 2025

Former employees of Wilko gain £2m payout

13 Jun 2025

Lawyers warn over impact of Employment Rights Bill...

13 Jun 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+