Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Employment lawEquality, diversity and inclusionEmployment tribunalsReligious discrimination

Climate change discrimination case settled out of court

by Kat Baker 16 Apr 2010
by Kat Baker 16 Apr 2010

The landmark case which enabled an employee to claim his environmental views amounted to a philosophical belief and should be protected has been settled out of court.

Employment lawyers warned the settlement in the Grainger Plc v Nicholson case meant the principle that climate change views could be philosophical beliefs and so protected from discrimination “still stands”, but another case would be needed before employers knew whether staff could be successful in such claims.

Tim Nicholson, who was made redundant from his role as head of sustainability at residential landlord Grainger in 2008, brought a claim for unfair dismissal and discrimination on the grounds of religion or belief.

Nicholson told the tribunal he had “a strongly held philosophical belief about climate change and the environment” which brought him into conflict with other senior staff.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Last March, he was given permission to bring a claim under the Employment Equality (Religion and Belief) Regulations 2003, which cover “any religion, religious belief, or philosophical belief”.

Stephen Simpson, employment law editor at XpertHR, said: “The settlement means that we are denied the employment tribunal’s consideration of whether Nicholson’s beliefs were strong enough in this case and, if so, whether he was actually discriminated against because of them. That will have to wait until another environmentalist brings a tribunal claim.”

Kat Baker

previous post
Presenteeism at Axa PPP more problematic than sickness absence, report finds
next post
Employers warned not to ‘piggy back’ off apprenticeships with poorer courses

You may also like

Police Scotland constable who can’t work in cold...

15 Aug 2025

BA crew member too anxious to fly wins...

13 Aug 2025

RAF sergeant’s maternity discrimination claim upheld at EAT

13 Aug 2025

Hospitality sector facing surge in tribunal claims

12 Aug 2025

Adviser who made sexual remarks unfairly dismissed by...

11 Aug 2025

Worker awarded £3,000 for ‘Slave’ graffiti employer had...

7 Aug 2025

Right-to-work crackdown: businesses left without ‘statutory excuse’

5 Aug 2025

Colleagues speaking foreign language ruled race discrimination

4 Aug 2025

Prison officer wins unfair dismissal and harassment case...

1 Aug 2025

Civil Service launches drive to attract interns from...

1 Aug 2025

  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise