Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Civil ServiceEmployment lawLatest NewsPay & benefitsRedundancy

Civil servant unions seek judicial review over redundancy pay cuts

by Kat Baker 11 Dec 2009
by Kat Baker 11 Dec 2009

Whitehall unions will seek legal action against the government’s decision to cut back civil service compensation schemes, and could ballot members for strike action.


In July the government announced that from April 2010, Whitehall redundancy packages will be capped at a maximum of two years’ salary for employees earning £25,000 or more – civil servants who have worked 20 years at Whitehall are currently entitled to three years’ pay – while people who rejoin the Civil Service after receiving a severance payment will have to pay some of the money back.


Ministers have said the cuts will save up to £500m over the next three years.


But unions have warned cutbacks on civil service compensation schemes will pave the way for the government to slash Whitehall jobs more cheaply.


The Public Commercial Services union (PCS), the senior civil servants’ union the FDA, and Prospect union have now announced they will jointly seek a judicial review of the government’s proposed changes.


A spokesman for the PCS told Personnel Today the union had already sought legal advice and “we will be getting the cogs moving over the next few days”. He added the unions could take the case to the High Court in a “matter of weeks”.


To implement the changes, the government will have to lay an order before parliament. But the PCS spokesman said that without union consent, any changes should be made through an Act which can only be passed following a debate in parliament and a positive vote in favour of changes.


The unions are seeking a judicial review to challenge the government’s decision not to seek union consent and to implement the changes with only an order in parliament.


The PCS said government ministers had agreed to talks to discuss the union’s concerns but alleged that these talks have now been cancelled four times in the past two months.


The union’s spokesman said: “We believe that for any changes and for that order to be laid, it needs to be with the agreement of the unions. Because the government is just ploughing ahead with that [without union agreement] we believe they need to not just lay an order, but an Act.


“If they don’t have the agreement of the unions, then there has to be that debate and that positive vote.”


He added: “What they are doing is also unlawful because it’s people’s contractual rights that are enshrined in law, so they need an Act to change that.”


The PCS has also pledged that should the government seek to lay an order in parliament – which is expected early in the New Year – it will immediately trigger a strike ballot for more than 270,000 of the union members.


Mark Serwotka, PCS general secretary, said: “The government has an opportunity to avoid legal and industrial action by ensuring officials honour ministerial promises to make the changes through negotiation rather than imposition.


Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“Cancelling meetings with unions and unilaterally announcing changes has angered staff who will be robbed of their entitlements if they are forced out of their jobs.”


Dave Penman, the FDA’s head of operations, added: “The government seems to have determined that an agreement was not possible and abandoned any meaningful negotiation. Unfortunately, we are now left with no option but to consider legal action to enforce what we believe are our members’ accrued rights to the current terms.”

Kat Baker

previous post
Bankers’ bonus tax could infringe human rights
next post
National Grid staff to be balloted on strike which could cause mass blackouts

You may also like

UK net migration slashed by half in one...

22 May 2025

How neuroscience can unlock employee recognition

22 May 2025

UK universities fret over fall in international students

22 May 2025

HSBC employees warned of office attendance link to...

22 May 2025

The Law Society: Navigating the new world of...

22 May 2025

Workplace stress: Why it’s time to rebrand resilience

22 May 2025

Restaurant tips should be included in holiday pay

21 May 2025

Fewer workers would comply with a return-to-office mandate

21 May 2025

Redefining leadership: From competence to inclusion

21 May 2025

Pay awards in real terms could fall for...

21 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+