Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Case lawEmployment lawMaternity

Brocklebank v Silveira

by Personnel Today 16 May 2006
by Personnel Today 16 May 2006

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Brocklebank v Silveira, EAT, 11 January 2006

Background
Miss Silveira, a Portuguese national, came to the UK under an arrangement with Seek Personnel Ltd, an employment agency jointly owned and managed by Mrs Brocklebank and Mr Machado. Seek Personnel arranged employment for Silveira at a chicken factory. Silveira disclosed on her pre-employment forms that she was pregnant and the prospective employer requested that Seek Personnel should complete a risk assessment sheet. No such assessment was completed, so Silveira brought a tribunal complaint of unlawful sex discrimination. She claimed that she had been prevented from obtaining employment as a result of sex discrimination by Seek Personnel.

The law Section 15(b) of the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 provides that it is unlawful for an employment agency to discriminate against a woman by refusing or deliberately omitting to provide any of its services. In this case, it was claimed that it was the agency and its manager/owners’ deliberate omission to provide the risk assess-ment required by the prospective employer, which amounted to unlawful sex discrimination.

Decision
The tribunal held that the undertaking of a first-level risk assessment was one of the services to be provided by Seek Personnel, and that it had deliberately omitted to do so, contrary to section 15 of the Sex Discrimination Act 1975. Accordingly, Silveira’s complaint of unlawful sex discrimination was upheld and Brocklebank and Machado were ordered to pay compensation. Brocklebank appealed.

Appeal
The appeal was dismissed. The Employment Appeal Tribunal found that the tribunal’s approach to the law and its application was correct and adequately set out in its decision.

Comment
This is one of a number of recent cases reminding organisations of their obligations to carry out risk assessments for pregnant staff. The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 create obligations for employers towards pregnant staff. The Health and Safety Executive has guidance on health and safety issues for new and expectant mothers.

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Internal relations: How well do HR and payroll really get on?
next post
Bank of New York to administer BA’s pension payments

You may also like

Government publishes ‘roadmap’ for Employment Rights Bill

1 Jul 2025

Government launches ‘landmark’ review of parental leave

1 Jul 2025

Employers’ duty of care: keeping workers safe in...

27 Jun 2025

When will the Employment Rights Bill become law?

26 Jun 2025

Seven ways to prepare now for the Employment...

20 Jun 2025

The employer strikes back: the rise of ‘quiet...

13 Jun 2025

Lawyers warn over impact of Employment Rights Bill...

13 Jun 2025

Racism claims have tripled and ‘Equality Act is...

12 Jun 2025

School’s bid to appeal Kristie Higgs ruling refused...

11 Jun 2025

Parental leave system is ‘broken’, say MPs

10 Jun 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+