Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Civil ServiceEmployment lawRedundancy

Civil service redundancy pay strike ‘won’t work’ says union boss

by Personnel Today 4 Feb 2010
by Personnel Today 4 Feb 2010

Five civil service unions accepted controversial government changes to the compensation scheme for workers made redundant because they believe the strike and legal action threatened by the PCS union are doomed to failure, according to a union boss.

On Tuesday, the Cabinet Office announced that compulsory redundancy packages will be capped at £60,000 for those earning less than half that amount, affecting four-fifths of the workforce.

Those earning more than £30,000 would see redundancy payments slashed from up to three years’ pay to a maximum of two years’ pay.

The PCS union immediately launched a strike ballot and lodged papers for a judicial review, arguing that the changes – due to come into effect in April – needed to be agreed with the unions rather than imposed.

But the remaining members of the Council of Civil Service Unions – Prospect, FDA, the Prison Officers’ Association, Unite and GMB – accepted the deal, after improved terms were agreed in January.

Civil Service Compensation Scheme: What’s changing?

  • Civil servants made compulsorily redundant will receive cash compensation of up to two years’ pay – down from three years’ pay.
  • For the lowest paid, cash payments will be capped at three years’ pay or £60,000, whichever is lower. To qualify for the maximum payment, staff need to have worked in the Civil Service for 20.5 years or more.
  • If made compulsorily redundant, staff aged at least 50 as of 31 March 2010, and with a minimum of five years’ service, will continue to receive existing compulsory retirement terms based on their years of service as of 31 March 2010.
  • Anyone who receives a severance payment and then returns to work for the Civil Service will have to pay back their cash settlement on a pro-rata basis.
  • The minimum qualifying period for a redundancy payment will be increased from one to two years.
  • The new compensation scheme will have no effect on existing civil service pension schemes.

Source: Cabinet Office

The new offer included protection for members aged 50 or over with five years’ service up to the date of the change, who will retain compulsory early retirement terms for service to this point; and protection for low-paid members earning £20,000 or less, so that staff made redundant retain a lump sum of up to three times their salary.

Prospect said the new offer “goes a significant way” to resolving matters likely to be dealt with at any judicial review, adding that, given the improvements secured, it considers it “unlikely” that industrial action would deliver better terms.

The five unions decided against legal action because of the timescale of the changes and the slim chance of success, according to Dai Hudd, Prospect deputy general secretary.

“The legal action was over a finite point of law on whether the scheme accrues in the way a pension does – not about contractual rights as the PCS has suggested,” he told Personnel Today. “And trade unions and the law courts are not exactly simpatico – we don’t want Lord Justice right-wing bastard ruining the deal.”

A spokesman for the PCS said the five unions represent a minority of civil service employees – 100,000 compared to 270,000 who are PCS members. “We are of the view that the proposals don’t go far enough to protect existing workers’ rights,” he added.

Avatar
Personnel Today

previous post
Employers miss out on diverse talent pool by sticking to top 20 universities
next post
Tube signal staff begin series of 24-hour strikes

You may also like

One in five employers planning ‘no jab no...

19 May 2022

MP demands timeline on carer’s leave legislation

13 May 2022

Rees-Mogg under fire from civil service leader over...

13 May 2022

Prime minister steps up calls for 90,000 civil...

13 May 2022

Queen’s Speech: absence of employment bill leaves organisations...

10 May 2022

Morrisons saves 16,000 jobs with McColl’s rescue deal

10 May 2022

Queen’s Speech: Exclusivity contracts for low-paid workers to...

9 May 2022

MP seeks legal protections for employees undergoing fertility...

9 May 2022

PwC staff to benefit from extended summer hours...

5 May 2022

A dark day for workers’ rights – why...

29 Apr 2022
  • Apprenticeships are the solution to your recruitment problems PROMOTED | Apprenticeships have the pulling power...Read more
  • What it really means to be mentally fit PROMOTED | What is mental fitness...Read more
  • How music can help to ease anxiety at work PROMOTED | A lot has happened since March 2020, hasn’t it?...Read more
  • Why now is the time to plug the unhealthy gap PROMOTED | We’ve all heard the term ‘health is wealth’...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+