Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employment lawCorporate manslaughter

Corporate killing law: how far will the Government go?

by DeeDee Doke 7 Dec 2004
by DeeDee Doke 7 Dec 2004


Business leaders support Government proposals for a corporate manslaughter Bill that would not include prosecution of individual directors for workplace casualties.

Ben Willmott, employee relations adviser at the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) said: “I think that in a large company, particularly, itÍs very difficult to see how one individual can be clearly seen as ultimately responsible, because of the size and complexity of large organisations.

“Would that necessarily be the best way of ensuring that, if there is any form of negligence, it doesn’t happen again?” he asked. “I’m not sure that is the best way forward.”

The Institute of Directors’ head of corporate governance, Patricia Peter, said the organisation is “pleased”  that the Government has opted not to seek the prosecution of individuals under the proposed legislation.

She believes the threat of bad publicity for companies accused of corporate killing provides at least one incentive for businesses to take their responsibilities seriously.

“People will know, and other companies will know who those directors involved in making those bad decisions are,” Peter said.

“I think what a lot of people fail to recognise is that companies, and certainly investors in companies, are increasingly aware of corporate reputation.

“Investors are looking more and more to companies to show that they are acting responsibly, that they do have proper risk management and risk assessment systems in place, and that these things are being discussed and considered at board level,” she said.

“Obviously, successful prosecution will also be necessary if the law isn’t to fall by the wayside. It’s got to be framed in such a way that it’s possible to secure a conviction. Otherwise it will be no more helpful than the existing law.”

Mike Elliker, legal director of law firm Addleshaw Goddard, believes that, as proposed, the new legislation will actually make convictions easier than they are under the current set-up.

Under the new laws, it will not be necessary to pinpoint one specific act that has led to a death. Instead, several interconnected issues can be identified – such as failures to train properly, supervise staff and have a proper system of work in place – which, taken together, constitute a serious management failure.

“It doesn’t have to be one act by one individual,” said Elliker. “So to that extent, it will make it easier to convict a company of the offence of corporate killing.”

Despite business’ views, UK unions are pressing forward with a proposed private member’s Bill that would hold individual directors to account.

A spokesman for the Transport and General Workers’ Union (T&G) said that unionists were hopeful Labour MP Stephen Hepburn of Jarrow will take forward the Bill proposed by the T&G and the Union of Construction, Allied Trades and Technicians (UCATT).

Although the Government has committed itself to the legislation, for which a draft has not yet been released, Elliker is among the legal experts who question whether the Government will finally bring such laws to fruition.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“The first point that arises is whether the Government is in fact really serious about introducing it”î he said. “There have been suggestions for something like four years that this was going to be implemented, and that is a long time for a matter to be left in abeyance if the Government is really serious about introducing the change.”

 

DeeDee Doke

previous post
Admin keeps HR off the strategic path
next post
Employers fear burden of maternity plans

You may also like

Fire and rehire: the relocation question

22 May 2025

Minister defends Employment Rights Bill at Acas conference

16 May 2025

CBI chair Soames accuses ministers of not listening...

16 May 2025

EHRC bows to pressure and extends gender consultation

15 May 2025

Contract cleaner loses EAT race discrimination appeal

14 May 2025

Construction workers win compensation claim against defunct employer

9 May 2025

Zero-hours workers’ rights to be extended from beyond...

8 May 2025

Employment tribunal backlog up 23% in a year

7 May 2025

Ministers urged to outlaw misuse of NDAs

7 May 2025

Employment Rights Bill must be tightened to protect...

1 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+