Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employment law

Dilemma of the month: disciplining a team after theft

by Personnel Today 29 Dec 2009
by Personnel Today 29 Dec 2009

I manage a team of 15 employees at a council office. Last month, £8,000 went missing and I’m convinced one or more of the staff were responsible. I have not been able to identify the culprit(s) so want to discipline the entire team. How far can I take this, and what risks would this course of action leave my employer and myself open to?

Theft is generally considered as serious misconduct justifying dismissal. Although other factors such as length of service and an unblemished record can be taken into account, in this case considering the large amounts of money involved, where a reasonable explanation cannot be given, this conduct would fall within gross misconduct.

Before any further steps are taken you need to ensure you have conducted a thorough investigation to avoid falling foul of the Burchell principles (ie, having reasonable belief in the employee’s guilt based on reasonable investigation). As a result, a perfectly plausible explanation may emerge or, alternatively, it may narrow down the possible list of culprits.

If, despite a full investigation, you cannot discover who is to blame, it is an established principle that it may be fair to discipline all the suspects and even to go as far as dismissing them. However, in this particular scenario, you could face claims of constructive dismissal if you discipline all 15 employees by issuing them with written or final written warnings, and potentially claims of unfair dismissal if you were to dismiss all 15.

You need to hold reasonable suspicion and where you do not have reasonable conclusive proof that one of those disciplined is actually guilty, reasonable suspicion will not be applicable – especially if one of the staff can establish that they could not possibly be guilty because they were on annual leave or at an external meeting. Harsh disciplinary action would be viewed as excessive, and also would not make commercial sense.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

There is no reason why you could not warn the whole team or those identified as possibly having been involved that if the guilty person does not own up, they will all be subject to a disciplinary procedure and may face dismissal. If no-one owns up, you could then follow the procedure to see whether your findings help you identify the individual(s). If not, you may have to leave it to a police investigation, which will have wider powers to search.

Shiva Shadi, employment partner, Davis Blank Furniss

Personnel Today

previous post
Policy clinic: International commuters
next post
Lottery winners and employers’ rights

You may also like

The employer strikes back: the rise of ‘quiet...

13 Jun 2025

Lawyers warn over impact of Employment Rights Bill...

13 Jun 2025

Racism claims have tripled and ‘Equality Act is...

12 Jun 2025

Court rejects Liberty’s legal challenge against EHRC consultation

9 Jun 2025

US Supreme Court lowers burden of proof for...

6 Jun 2025

Institute of Directors demand reforms to Employment Rights...

6 Jun 2025

Employment Rights Bill: peers propose change to work...

4 Jun 2025

Facilities firms share ‘deep concerns’ on workers’ rights

4 Jun 2025

NDA ban vital to tackling misogyny in music...

4 Jun 2025

Disability harassment and discrimination ‘shockingly high’

3 Jun 2025

  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more
  • Preparing for a new era of workforce planning (webinar) WEBINAR | Employers now face...Read more
  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+