Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Latest News

Discrimination laws only cover workers in the UK

by Personnel Today 30 Jun 2004
by Personnel Today 30 Jun 2004

Under
the sex and race discrimination legislation, an employee can claim
discrimination "unless the employee does his work wholly outside Great
Britain", according to a new tribunal ruling.

The
Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT) handed down its decision in the case of
Saggar (& ors.) v Ministry of Defence, which concerned the position of
three army officers under discrimination law, who were based outside the UK.

Chris
Davis from Halliwell Landau law firm, said the case would help multinational
employers anticipate where discrimination claims would be coming from.

The
court considered three questions:

1.  What is the time at which whether the
Applicant works outside Great Britain to be judged?

The
tribunal held that you need to look at the time of the allegations of
discrimination.

 There is no discrimination at an
establishment in the UK if the person being discriminated against (abroad) is
either someone who used to work in the UK, but has not done so for many years,
or is employed under a contract that means they might be employed in the UK,
but in fact they never have been

2.  What is work?

In
one of the cases, the overseas officer attended training courses in the UK
during the year.  If this was ‘work’,
then she did not do her work ‘wholly’ outside the UK, so the tribunal would
have had jurisdiction to hear her complaints.

The
EAT held that attendance at a training course may be work (and, on the facts in
this case, was work) – the important factors being the contractual position,
the content of the work, its duration and regularity

3.  Is there a de minimis exception? (ie so
small that’s it’s not going to make any difference in practice)

Yes.  One of the cases involved an army chaplain
who attended a funeral in the UK (which was held to be ‘work’), while based in
Germany.  The EAT held that a de minimis
principle applied, and that "it would offend against the de minimis
principle to found jurisdiction on a one-day visit"

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

(Thanks
to Daniel Barnett, 1 Temple Gardens, for case clarification)

By Michael Millar

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Long-service awards get shorter
next post
Labour leak reveals consideration of public smoking ban

You may also like

Co-op equal pay claims move onto next stage

30 Jun 2025

‘Be direct’ to avoid escalating conflict, advises Acas

30 Jun 2025

Reforming paternity leave could benefit UK by £13bn...

30 Jun 2025

Fall in entry-level jobs linked to rise of...

30 Jun 2025

Employers’ duty of care: keeping workers safe in...

27 Jun 2025

Welfare cuts would ‘undermine workforce inclusion and business...

27 Jun 2025

MPs urge ministers to boost T-level awareness to...

27 Jun 2025

Progressive DEI policy is a red line for...

27 Jun 2025

Bank of England says NIC rise is dampening...

27 Jun 2025

Bioethanol plant closure could lead to 4,000 job...

26 Jun 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+