Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employment lawDismissalRecruitment & retention

Government must delay scrapping default retirement age, says CBI

by Laura Chamberlain 13 Dec 2010
by Laura Chamberlain 13 Dec 2010

The Government must delay scrapping the default retirement age (DRA) until it has filled the “legislative void” faced by employers, the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) has warned.

According to the CBI, companies will face “huge uncertainty” and a greater risk of tribunal claims if the Government does not tackle the consequences of its decision to abolish the DRA.

In the absence of a replacement to the DRA, the CBI has called for:



  • the abolition of the DRA, due to come into force from April 2011, to be delayed for a year so businesses can prepare;
  • retirement conversations between employers and workers to be protected from legal challenge;
  • the law on peformance management and unfair dismissal to be simplified and more balanced;
  • clarity on how companies can use “objective justification” to defend a set retirement age; and
  • employers not to be obliged to offer occupational benefits, such as death-in-service cover, beyond the state pension age.

Employment relations minister Edward Davey announced last week that the Government is to review workplace rights compliance and enforcement arrangements. The CBI has identified this as an opportunity to amend the legislative framework and help employers operate in the absence of the “DRA safety net”.

John Cridland, director-general designate of the CBI, said that there should be no changes to the retirement framework until the issues outlined by the CBI have been resolved.

“The Government is liable to say these questions will be answered by case law but they cannot duck these issues and allow 10 years of case law to decide for them. Employers don’t want to be test cases,” Cridland argued.

The Government has undertaken a consultation on the types of support required by business and will be publishing their response shortly.

A spokesman for the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills said that the vast majority of employers already choose to operate without fixed retirement ages and that many of the 500 respondents to the consultation strongly supported the plan that the department had set out.

“We are committed to helping and supporting employers adapt to the change in regulations and will be providing them with guidance – but we should not stop people from working just because they have reached a particular age,” he explained.

Despite supporting the call for more clarity in the current laws, the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) has said that employers have had plenty of time to start thinking about how to manage without the DRA.

The CIPD’s diversity adviser, Dianah Worman, said: “The legal frameworks need to be fit for purpose but I think there has to be fairness embedded in those processes and they shouldn’t be skewed in favour of one party or the other.

“You don’t want to build into these frameworks excuses that mean employers have a cop-out for not delivering the basic law.”

From 6 April 2011 transitional arrangements for the abolition of the DRA will come in and employers will no longer be able to issue new notifications of retirement under the statutory procedure.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The TUC has supported the need for clear guidance for employers, but backed the Government’s abolition of the DRA. General secretary Brendan Barber said: “It cannot be right that workers lose their protection against arbitrary dismissal overnight upon reaching 65.”








XpertHR FAQs on the abolition of the DRA



  • What is the expected timetable for the abolition of the default retirement age?
  • Will there be transitional arrangements for the abolition of the default retirement age?
  • How will employers deal with retirement after the abolition of the default retirement age?
  • Will employers still be able to operate a compulsory retirement age after the abolition of the default retirement age?
  • Will anything replace the current statutory retirement procedure after the abolition of the default retirement age?
  • After the abolition of the default retirement age, how should employers deal with employees aged over 65 who are underperforming?
  • How will the abolition of the default retirement age affect employers that have a compulsory retirement age of 65?
  • After the abolition of the default retirement age, employers will have to justify objectively having a compulsory retirement age. What does this mean?
  • How will the abolition of the default retirement age affect employment tribunal claims in relation to retirement?

CBI
Laura Chamberlain

previous post
New British Standard on collaborative business relationships launched
next post
2011: a forecast by McDonalds’ David Fairhurst

You may also like

How neuroscience can unlock employee recognition

22 May 2025

Minister defends Employment Rights Bill at Acas conference

16 May 2025

Workers ‘wait and see’ as companies struggle to...

16 May 2025

CBI chair Soames accuses ministers of not listening...

16 May 2025

EHRC bows to pressure and extends gender consultation

15 May 2025

‘Polygamous working’ is a minefield for HR

14 May 2025

Contract cleaner loses EAT race discrimination appeal

14 May 2025

So what does the election of a new...

9 May 2025

Construction workers win compensation claim against defunct employer

9 May 2025

Rumours during recruitment: how should HR respond?

9 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+