Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Age discriminationEquality, diversity and inclusionLatest News

Heyday urges retirees to lodge age discrimination claims after ruling

by Greg Pitcher 12 Dec 2006
by Greg Pitcher 12 Dec 2006

All workers forced to retire since 1 October this year have been urged to lodge age discrimination claims after a High Court ruling last week.


A senior judge ruled the challenge to the government’s mandatory retirement age, brought by baby-boomers’ group Heyday, should be referred to the European Court of Justice (ECJ).


This leaves employers open to paying compensation to anyone they force into retirement before a ruling is made – which might not be for another two years.


Andrew Harrop, the head of policy at Heyday, told Personnel Today: “Employees should make applications now if they have been forced into retirement. The claims will be put on hold pending a European judgment. My advice to employers is not to take the risk and not to force people to retire.”


Heyday claims that up to 25,000 people are retired against their will each year.


Owen Warnock, employment law partner at Eversheds law firm, said public sector organisations were at extra risk of claims as they were bound by the “intent” of European law, while private sector firms could argue that they complied with UK law.


Sam Mercer, director of the Employers Forum on Age, “strongly recommended” that employers consider operating without a retirement age.


The judge referred the case to the ECJ after the government agreed with Heyday that its transposition of a European law should be scrutinised. The Employment Equality (Age) Regulations came into force in the UK on 1 October to implement the EU Framework Directive from 2000.


Heyday told the High Court that the UK law was illegal, as it discriminates against people on the grounds of age.


Robert Allen QC, speaking on behalf of Heyday, argued that people aged 65 or over were given “second-class status”, as they could be retired without explanation. People under 65 had to be given sound grounds for dismissal, he said.


The government countered that, from the age of 65, people were “not in comparison” with under-65s, as they received a state pension. Solicitors from both parties will now thrash out the terms of the referral and report back to the High Court in January.


Alex Ferguson champions Heyday’s cause


A Heyday representative stood outside the High Court in London last week, proudly clutching a letter personally signed by Sir Alex Ferguson.


The Manchester United manager is a fitting champion of Heyday’s cause, having won plenty of trophies since pulling back from the brink of retirement in 2002.


Ferguson wrote: “I sincerely believe that people should be able to work past retirement age if they are fit, healthy and able to do their job.”


He was far from the only voice supporting the case.


Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

After the hearing, age discrimination campaigner Joyce Glasser said: “The government has said over-65s are not comparable to under-65s because they can scrape by on a state pension. It is saying: ‘Let them vegetate – every so often we will send them a cheque for fuel, and that’s enough.'”





 

Greg Pitcher

previous post
Have a rant: On the phone and in your face
next post
Opt-in personal pensions system to be announced by government

You may also like

Reshuffle sparks fears over Employment Rights Bill

8 Sep 2025

Report calls for ban on barristers’ sexual relations...

8 Sep 2025

Jobcentres more about benefits than work, say MPs

8 Sep 2025

Pay awards feeling tightest squeeze since December 2021

8 Sep 2025

Employee who shopped online at work wins unfair...

8 Sep 2025

EHRC submits new code of practice to government

5 Sep 2025

Lloyds Banking Group to target underperformers for job...

5 Sep 2025

How to manage workplace investigations effectively

5 Sep 2025

Manager who called bosses ‘dickheads’ was unfairly dismissed

5 Sep 2025

Jaguar Land Rover staff sent home after cyber...

5 Sep 2025

  • Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain with centred ergonomics SPONSORED | If you often notice...Read more
  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits Live
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise