Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Case lawEmployee relationsDispute resolution

HM Prison Service v Beart, EAT, 26 October 2004

by Eversheds HR Group 7 Dec 2004
by Eversheds HR Group 7 Dec 2004

No limit to compensation
HM Prison Service v Beart, EAT, 26 October 2004

Beart was an administrative officer with HM Prison Service. She successfully claimed disability discrimination and unfair dismissal when it failed to redeploy or relocate her when she was off work with depression.

Appeals by HM Prison Service to the Employment Appeal Tribunal and the Court of Appeal failed.

Beart was awarded substantial six-figure compensation in respect of her disability discrimination claim, and a basic award of 3,300 and damages for personal injury, injury to feelings and aggravated damages. HM Prison Service was also ordered to pay some of the costs of the tribunal hearings.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

It appealed against the compensation on a number of grounds and, in particular, argued that Beart’s subsequent dismissal terminated its liability for the earlier wrong of disability discrimination, and that all further losses had to be assessed under the unfair dismissal regime (ie with a statutory cap) as opposed to the substantial sums recovered under disability discrimination compensation.

The appeal was dismissed. There was clear evidence that the psychiatric harm caused by the act of discrimination and its impact upon Beart’s ability to work continued far beyond the date of her dismissal, and in the absence of a fair dismissal, there was no reason why compensation should end at that date.

Eversheds HR Group

previous post
Employers better get to grips with claim culture
next post
Just how much holiday is simply too much holiday?

You may also like

Acas to explore use of AI as half...

27 Aug 2025

London hotel housekeepers call off strike action

27 Aug 2025

Royal Mail eCourier drivers bring legal claim over...

26 Aug 2025

Space X scores court win against US National...

22 Aug 2025

Scottish government faces legal action over gender policies

18 Aug 2025

Hospitality sector facing surge in tribunal claims

12 Aug 2025

Resident doctors reach ‘greater mutual understanding’ with government

6 Aug 2025

MPs ‘openly hostile’ to preferred choice for EHRC...

24 Jul 2025

NHS England toughens stance on resident doctors’ strike

24 Jul 2025

Resident doctors strikes to go ahead

23 Jul 2025

  • Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain with centred ergonomics SPONSORED | If you often notice...Read more
  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise