Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Opinion

Legal opinion: TV show The Apprentice puts discrimination in a spin

by Personnel Today 14 Jun 2007
by Personnel Today 14 Jun 2007

What can we learn from Sir Alan Sugar’s hellish job interviews on TV’s The Apprentice?

It’s not an exaggeration to say that the latest series of The Apprentice has transfixed viewers. Whether it’s Tre’s direct approach to resolving workplace problems (“You are nothing to me…”) or Katie’s unusual method of providing peer group feedback, we can’t seem to get enough of it.

But amid the theatre of the boardroom sacking sessions, are there any HR or employment law lessons we can take from this insight into the hiring and firing mentality of a high-profile employer?

Take Sir Alan Sugar’s comments in an early episode to a young female participant. He was skating on thin ice when he expressed his doubts that this individual was too young for the role. Have Sugar and the programme makers not heard of the Age Regulations?

I breathed a slight sigh of relief when, in the final analysis, the reason for this contestant’s ejection was her poor performance in the task, Sugar expressly ruling age out as a relevant consideration.

Hardcore interviews

Which brings us to episode 11, in which Sugar was helped by three business associates to whittle down the five remaining apprentices to the two finalists. The interviews themselves were pretty hardcore by most standards, candidates variously being described as boring, “grasshopper-minded” and ruthless.

However, it is the treatment of Kristina and Katie that have attracted the most attention.

When reminded that the job in Sugar’s company would be London-based, both women were quizzed about how they would cope with relocation to London in light of family commitments (from Yorkshire and Devon, respectively). Katie admitted in the concluding session before Sugar and his panel that she could not guarantee a smooth move from Devon to London without first checking with her parents.

Pressed to make a decision, Katie decided to withdraw and, in effect, fired herself, leaving Kristina and Simon to fight over the spoils.

Sexist or justified?

Was this focus on the practicalities of working arrangements for the women discriminatory, when similar points were not pressed with the male competitors? Or did it reveal an ignorance of the obligation to take seriously requests for flexible working? Are these fair points to make in the circumstances?

We need to accept that The Apprentice is not real life it is deliberately melodramatic and offers ‘fly on the wall’ information which would never be available in a true hiring and firing context. That is what makes it such great TV.

While I accept that some of the questioning is not out of the modern textbook – which is a diplomatic way of saying, don’t copy it in the workplace – I don’t buy into the discrimination argument.

All contestants were grilled, irrespective of personal characteristics, and it is arguably only because Kristina and Katie were effectively the frontrunners that they came under such close scrutiny.

I don’t think that Katie was forced out because of her relocation issue she backed out after being pressured about whether she genuinely wanted the job or was simply interested in the publicity of winning. That is the context in which she chose to step down and we should respect her for that.

I would put a more positive spin on the debate. The programme has portrayed very graphically the strength and skills of women and ethnic minority candidates.

In this regard, The Apprentice could be said to have made a real contribution to improving opportunities for all in the workplace.

Ashley Norman is employment law partner and head of diversity, Pinsent Masons

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Discrimination in recruitment

  • Anti-discrimination laws apply as much to the recruitment process as they do to employment itself.
  • Aside from compensation for loss of earnings, tribunals can award damages for injury to feelings.
  • Usually, evidence of direct discrimination will be hard to come by but tribunals will draw inferences from the surrounding circumstances.
  • Claimants may rely on statistical evidence of the profile of successful (and unsuccessful) job applicants and can use statutory questionnaires to obtain information about the employer’s record on diversity.

What do you think? E-mail [email protected]

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Education and skills secretary Alan Johnson reveals first 150 organisations to sign up to Leitch skills pledge
next post
Invest Milton Keynes claims investor interest in the city is at highest level for four years

You may also like

Culture, ‘micro-incivilities’ and invisible talent

14 May 2025

Rethinking talent: Who was never considered in the...

7 May 2025

Eight ways to best support grieving employees

6 May 2025

Leading with honest feedback: A responsibility in recruitment

24 Apr 2025

Exploring the best London office locations for ‘Zillennials’

16 Apr 2025

Remote working isn’t bad – it just needs...

1 Apr 2025

Sexual harassment: Employees have the right to protection...

18 Mar 2025

Workspace flexibility: Optimising your office needs for purpose

11 Mar 2025

Should HR worry about idea theft in the...

11 Mar 2025

Questions your CEO really needs to ask about...

7 Mar 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+